Cheryl Hines has publicly addressed claims made by Chelsea Handler regarding alleged issues with the home Handler purchased from Hines and her husband, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Handler recently described the property as “toxic” and claimed that it had delayed her move-in for several years. Hines shared her viewpoint during an interview on the podcast *Tomi Lahren Is Fearless*, where she expressed her disbelief over the timing of Handler’s remarks.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/cheryl-hines-chelsea-handler-032626-10ef7b0c8593489296d56a2f48cdc98e.jpg)
Handler, who finally moved into the house this month after years of dealing with what she described as major problems, has indicated that she felt misled by the previous owners. Hines, known for her role in the television series *Curb Your Enthusiasm*, contested these allegations, questioning why Handler has only now chosen to voice her complaints after making the purchase five years ago.
In the interview segment set to be released on March 26, Hines remarked, “She bought this house five years ago and she’s just now complaining about it, which is also, I don’t know that she’s getting a lot of sympathy from people. She’s buying a £6 million house.” Hines insinuated that Handler’s accusations lack credibility, particularly given the considerable time that has passed since the sale.
Hines recounted her efforts to reach out to Handler after the sale, suggesting that her intentions were sincere. “I did write her a personal note when she moved in, just saying how much we love the house. And I hope that she has a beautiful life in this house. And if you need anything, call me,” she explained. Hines further questioned the authenticity of Handler’s claims by stating, “I wouldn’t have left my number if we were trying to unload a toxic house on her.”
Amidst the ongoing controversy, Hines conjectured that Handler might be seeking attention or attempting to entertain her audience by sharing these grievances. “So, what are you going to do? She’s trying to get a laugh, I guess, and some likes,” Hines concluded, suggesting that Handler’s comments might be motivated more by the desire for publicity than by a genuine concern.
Handler had previously shared her struggles with the house during a recent appearance on the *Jimmy Kimmel Live* show while promoting her comedy tour. “It took me four years to move in. There [were] a lot of problems with the house—I blame him,” she stated, presumably referring to RFK Jr. She added that issues pertaining to the property were not uncovered during the initial inspection, which only worsened her experience.
The comedian discussed her frustrations on her podcast, *Dear Chelsea*, stating that the home was left in such a “toxic” state that it prevented her from living there for an extended period. “I still have not lived in this house. That’s how f—ed up this house was,” she asserted.
During her podcast, Handler elaborated on the home’s condition and described a particularly alarming inspection report, where she claimed experts indicated that the environment was so hazardous she could not occupy the space for at least two years. “This house is the most toxic environment. You cannot live here for at least two years,” she quoted the inspectors as saying.
Handler’s troubles did not end with toxicity concerns. She alleged that an “illegal” addition had been made to the property without proper disclosure, causing further complications. She expressed her dissatisfaction with the inspection process, noting, “In the last week of inspection, they came and I finally — like, everything’s been redone — and they’re like, there’s a unit, like a little outdoor storage unit, that’s been there since I bought the property. And they’re like, ‘This is illegal.’”
The ongoing dialogue surrounding the home has drawn significant media attention, highlighting the complexities involved in real estate transactions, particularly for high-profile individuals. The contrasting narratives provided by Handler and Hines underscore the contentious nature of the situation, as both parties present their versions of events. With Handler’s recent comments going viral, it remains to be seen how this dispute will evolve and whether any further legal or public responses will emerge.