**Halle Berry Denies Child Abuse Allegations Amid Custody Dispute**
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Halle-Berry-Greenwich-Hotel-2026-Olivier-Martinez-Mars-premiere-2016-101326-8e9971cd4bf74fa483bad233a6aa31ce.jpg)

Halle Berry has publicly denied allegations made by her ex-husband Olivier Martinez concerning an incident involving their 13-year-old son, Maceo. The actress’s denial comes in response to claims that a photograph taken by Maceo served as evidence of alleged abuse. Martinez has accused Berry of physically harming their son during an incident on September 26, prompting a contentious custody battle.

In legal filings submitted on October 12, Martinez argued that the picture Maceo took shows signs of trauma, suggesting that the boy had been “roughed up” in the past but was not believed. However, Berry has refuted this claim, asserting that the photograph does not substantiate Martinez’s allegations of strangulation or any form of abuse. According to her response, the image simply depicts her standing calmly, with her hands in her pockets, and poses no evidence of injuries suggested by Martinez.
Martinez, who is seeking sole custody of Maceo, alleged in his filings that Berry physically abused their son and referenced previous incidents of alleged maltreatment. Berry responded by highlighting her own history as a victim of domestic violence, contending that the accusations are unfounded and damaging.
In a separate legal declaration, Berry countered Martinez’s depiction of the photograph, noting that it lacks any indication of injury. She specifically mentioned that there are “no signs of redness, bruising, or marks on Maceo’s neck” that would corroborate her ex-husband’s charges. Berry suggested that Martinez is attempting to misconstrue a straightforward observation made by her current fiancé, Van Hunt, who reportedly did not see any injuries on Maceo.
In terms of the custody hearings, Martinez has claimed Maceo wishes to testify. He expressed concern that failing to allow their son to speak in court could lead to him feeling discouraged from reporting any future issues of abuse. Martinez maintained that it is critical for Maceo’s voice to be heard regarding the events of the September incident.
In her response, Berry levelled accusations against Martinez, claiming he had manipulated and coached Maceo in relation to his testimony. Berry’s legal team argued that Martinez is attempting to exploit their son’s statements while disregarding the accounts of adult witnesses who were present during the incident.
Martinez’s lawyer, Patrick Baghdaserians, has denied the allegations of manipulation, asserting that their son is the main victim in this situation. He expressed that victims of abuse should have the ability to share their experiences and reaffirmed his concerns about Berry’s motivation to exclude Maceo’s testimony from the proceedings.
The unfolding drama has drawn significant media attention, reflecting both the challenges and intricacies of high-profile custody battles. As both parties prepare for further legal proceedings, the court will need to sift through these accusations and determine the best course of action for Maceo’s welfare.
This ongoing legal dispute raises broader questions about the management of custody arrangements in the context of domestic violence allegations. Experts suggest that courts must tread carefully in such cases to ensure that the safety and well-being of the child remain the priority.
As the situation develops, both Halle Berry and Olivier Martinez are expected to continue their legal fight, with Maceo at the centre of a deeply personal and public issue.
