A Texas couple, Christopher and Raquelle Judge, have been sentenced to federal prison after pleading guilty to a fraudulent home building scheme that defrauded clients of nearly $5 million. The couple operated their construction business, Judge DFW LLC, from August 2020 until January 2023, during which they failed to complete numerous home building and renovation projects.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Christopher-Judge-Raquelle-Judge-1726-197dc7a89def42ff9ae0a4485dc91561.jpg)
On 1 September, the U.S. District Court in Fort Worth handed down sentences to both Christopher and Raquelle Judge for conspiring to commit wire fraud. Christopher was given a sentence of six and a half years in federal prison, along with two years of supervised release. Raquelle received a lesser sentence of one month in prison followed by three years of supervised release. In addition to their prison terms, the Judges have been ordered to pay restitution of nearly $2.8 million to compensate 20 victims.
The Judges’ fraudulent scheme involved misleading clients by promoting their services as custom architecture, construction, and interior design at rates significantly lower than the market average. Once clients paid for their services, the couple would abandon the projects, leaving homes incomplete and in some cases, uninhabitable. This manipulation resulted in substantial financial and emotional distress for the affected families.
Kristin Newman, a victim of the Judges, detailed her experience in a recent interview, describing how she was drawn to the couple’s enthusiasm and fresh approach when selecting a contractor for her home. After making multiple substantial payments for work on her Fort Worth bungalow, she found progress to be alarmingly slow. An independent inspection revealed extensive issues with the construction, which prompted her to seek the Judges’ assistance. Instead, she found Christopher distancing himself from the project, further compounding her frustration.
Court documents indicate that the Judges misappropriated client funds for extravagant personal expenses. This included a staggering $27,000 for mortgage payments, approximately $82,000 in Amazon purchases, and around $10,000 on cosmetic surgery. Victims like Newman expressed outrage over the Judges’ use of their funds on luxuries while they sat with partially constructed homes that were inadequately built.
On 8 September, Christopher Judge filed an appeal against the sentencing, although the grounds for his appeal have not been disclosed. Meanwhile, the sentencing has offered a degree of closure to victims like Newman, who expressed relief at the Judges’ convictions and hoped it would prevent them from defrauding others in the future. She noted that the lasting label of felony could impact the couple’s lives significantly.
However, Newman also expressed disappointment with the leniency of Raquelle’s sentence, suggesting that her involvement in the fraudulent scheme warranted a harsher penalty. She believed the risk to the couple’s children should not have overshadowed the impact of their actions on the victims’ families, including those who endured severe hardships due to the Judges’ actions.
Victims such as Newman are entitled to restitution, with her family set to receive $175,000. Nevertheless, she expressed doubt about ever receiving the full amount, given the enormous restitution requirement exceeding $2.8 million against the couple. Those convicted are obliged to make monthly payments of at least £100 towards repayment, a process Newman fears could take “three lifetimes” to conclude.
The case has raised concerns about the accountability of those working in the home construction industry, emphasising the importance of conducting thorough due diligence before hiring contractors. The fallout from the Judges’ actions serves as a stark reminder of the risks homeowners face and highlights the need for regulatory oversight in the construction sector to better protect consumers from similar fraudulent schemes in the future.