Erin Andrews, the renowned sports commentator, has opened up about the trauma she endured following the release of a secretly filmed video in 2009. Speaking on the popular podcast “Call Her Daddy,” host Alex Cooper listened as Andrews recounted the harrowing incident that not only shook her personal life but profoundly affected her career.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/erin-andrews-call-her-daddy-090226-eb729baaed4d44f0812012313eba2b85.jpg)
The 48-year-old sports reporter described how, while working as a sideline reporter for ESPN’s College GameDay, she received shocking news from a friend who called her in a panic, stating that explicit videos of her were circulating online. At first, Andrews dismissed the claims, insisting to her friend that such a thing was impossible. However, the unfolding reality proved to be far more distressing than she could have imagined.

Describing the moment, Andrews recalled how her friend sent her the video, prompting her to immediately notify her parents. “I was screaming, crying because it was me and it was me naked in a hotel room,” she shared, recalling how her father thought she had been in a car accident due to her desperate cries. Reflecting on that traumatic moment, Andrews expressed her despair about her future in broadcasting, remarking, “It’s over, my career is over. No one’s going to take me seriously ever again.”

The man behind the invasion of Andrews’ privacy was identified as Michael David Barrett, who had tracked her movements and secretly filmed her through a peephole while she was in hotels. Barrett’s actions led to his arrest by the FBI in October 2009, resulting in a sentence of two and a half years in prison, alongside fines and restitution payments exceeding £12,000. Following the incident, Andrews launched civil litigation against Barrett, as well as Marriott International and Radisson Hotels for their roles in this violation, ultimately securing a settlement of $55 million in 2016.
Andrews vividly recalled how Barrett had manipulated hotel procedures to gain access to her. He would request to be placed in rooms adjacent to hers, allowing him to carry out his intrusive actions undetected. “There was this disgusting person following me around,” she remarked, detailing how he would listen for her movements to determine the right moment to film her. The severity of the situation was exacerbated by the fact that, once the footage was online, it was nearly impossible to erase its existence from the internet.
When Cooper asked about her feelings during the ordeal, Andrews simply stated, “Gross, gross,” conveying the overwhelming sense of violation she experienced. Despite attempts to carry on with her career, she felt as though people would always have the leaked video in the back of their minds. The public’s response added to her distress, as many initially misconstrued the situation. “People thought I did it to myself for publicity, which was the exact opposite of how I was feeling,” Andrews explained.
In dealing with the immense media scrutiny and personal fallout, Andrews made the decision to retreat to her family for support. “I left my home in Atlanta and hid in my high school bedroom,” she recounted, grateful she wasn’t on air at the time, allowing her to escape the harsh glare of the spotlight. This period of retreat demonstrated her need for recovery from a situation that had spiralled out of control.
As she reflected on the current climate surrounding issues of privacy and consent, Andrews expressed a sense of hope. “The crazy part now is just kind of seeing how the world and perception… if a crime like this had happened, it would have been a totally different situation,” she suggested, pointing to a shift in societal attitudes toward such violations.
Erin Andrews’ candid discussions provide a glimpse into the mental and emotional turmoil faced by victims of cybercrime and invasion of privacy. Her story is one of resilience and serves as a powerful reminder of the challenges many endure in the face of harassment and exploitation. The podcast episode underscores not just her personal journey, but also the broader implications of such breaches in privacy, driving home the message that public figures are also vulnerable to the horrors of unrelenting scrutiny and malice.
