Authorities in New York have apprehended a man accused of abducting his son during a custody dispute that lasted for over a year. Dwight C. Richards, aged 54, was arrested on 15 June 2025 following the recovery of his son, 12-year-old King Richards, who had been reported missing since March 2025.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/King-Richards-Dwight-Richards-062626-f6603a210e2543e39341bba222089bd9.jpg)

The New Rochelle Police Department provided details regarding the apparent abduction, stating that King was taken during a court-mandated custodial proceeding. His mother reported him missing shortly after his disappearance, prompting an investigation that ultimately led to the identification of Dwight as a suspect.

On 15 June, Dwight was taken into custody after allegedly “facilitating [his son’s] return”. Thankfully, following an evaluation, authorities confirmed that King was found to be in good health. This positive outcome stands in contrast to the lengthy period of uncertainty and distress experienced by his mother and the wider community.
In the months preceding his arrest, Dwight failed to comply with a court order requiring him to return King to court. The Westchester County District Attorney’s Office noted that his absence during a July 2025 court date prompted the issuance of a warrant for his arrest. His actions reportedly contravened both the court’s directives and the Family Court Act.
Following the recovery, police confirmed that King had been returned to his mother, who had been granted full custody while he was missing. The resolution has brought a sense of relief to her and raised questions about the legal measures in place to protect children involved in custody disputes.
Court records indicate that Dwight has been charged with second-degree criminal contempt, along with a violation of the Family Court Act. In response to these charges, he has pleaded not guilty. The upcoming proceedings will determine the legal ramifications of his actions during this prolonged custody case.
This case has drawn attention from both the public and media, highlighting ongoing concerns over child custody disputes and parental abduction. Advocacy groups are calling for greater safeguards to prevent similar incidents from recurring in the future. As such cases often involve intense emotions and complex family dynamics, the legal system’s ability to address these issues while ensuring the safety and welfare of children remains paramount.
With the recent developments, many in New Rochelle are keenly awaiting the next steps in the legal process. It is hoped that this incident will lead to a broader dialogue about child custody arrangements and the rights of parents, as well as the responsibilities of the court system in ensuring compliance with its orders. As this story unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the urgent need for vigilance in safeguarding children’s rights during custody battles.
