In a revealing new book, “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump,” journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan document the chaotic moments following the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk on 10 September 2025. The narrative highlights the unexpected role played by Barron Trump, the former president’s youngest son, who was the first to inform his father about the grave incident.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Barron-Trump--Charlie-Kirk-062526-75a15cbc9c294360af27461e98b5d975.jpg)
Charlie Kirk, a prominent figure in right-wing circles and a close ally of Donald Trump, was shot in the neck during a debate with students at Utah Valley University. The shocking news sent ripples through Washington as the president and his advisors scrambled for information in the immediate aftermath. Barron Trump, then 19 years old, was reportedly distressed by the event, fearing that political violence could threaten their family.

According to the book, as aides battled to gather accurate details about Kirk’s condition, it was Barron who reached out to his father with the alarming news. The urgency of the situation grew as the president, who had previously survived an assassination attempt during his 2024 campaign, sought to reassure his son. In an attempt to calm Barron, Trump is quoted saying, “calm down, honey, calm down,” despite showing signs of considerable unease himself.

The narrative in “Regime Change” continues as aides attempted to piece together the facts surrounding Kirk’s shooting while Trump remained in the Oval Office for a meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Following a series of attempts to contact local hospitals, officials finally obtained critical information about Kirk’s situation before passing it on to the president.
Kirk’s presence in the political landscape was significant; he had been instrumental in galvanising youth support during Trump’s presidential campaign in 2024. His long-standing friendship with the former president included an association with Vice President JD Vance and a variety of right-wing movements. As the news about Kirk’s injury unfolded, Trump expressed his concern for the individual who had been a significant ally in his pursuits.
The situation escalated as details emerged regarding the severity of Kirk’s injuries. When informed that Kirk had been shot in the neck, the president appeared visibly troubled and remarked, “that’s not good.” As he reflected on Kirk’s contributions to his campaign, Trump’s emotional response showcased the deep bond they shared.
Despite the gravity of the situation, Trump’s fascination with their relationship was palpable during subsequent public appearances. Just days after the event, he recounted a meeting with Barron where his son expressed admiration for Kirk. “I thought he was going to say, ‘I want to meet like King Charles’ or something,” Trump recalled, reflecting on how his son sought to connect with Kirk. The former president described setting up a lunch for the two, resulting in Barron declaring Kirk to be “great.”
As the days progressed, video footage of Kirk’s shooting became available, prompting Trump to request to see it. However, the disturbing nature of the incident forced him to look away. Later commenting on the distressing sight, he lamented, “It’s horrible… Poor Charlie.” This personal sorrow appeared to resonate deeply, marking the incident as a significant event not only in Kirk’s life but also in the Trump family’s ongoing narrative.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has left an indelible mark on the political landscape, reiterating the potential for violence in current political discourse. Barron Trump’s initial reaction to the news of Kirk’s shooting highlights the personal impact of such incidents on families involved in public life and the pervasive nature of fear surrounding political violence.
As more details emerge from “Regime Change,” the interplay between personal relationships and political dynamics continues to be further scrutinised. The book shines a light on how the lives of public figures intersect with national security issues and the emotional legacies left by such tragic events.
Overall, the book serves as both an insight into the internal workings of the Trump presidency and a reflection on the broader implications of political violence in contemporary society. The relationships formed and broken throughout this tumultuous period underscore the fragility of political alliances and the personal toll paid by those at the forefront of national debates.
