Dua Lipa, the renowned Grammy Award-winning artist, has launched legal proceedings against Samsung Electronics, accusing the company of exploiting her image without permission on packaging for their televisions. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, claims that Samsung has used a copyrighted photo of Lipa, taken during a backstage moment at the Austin City Limits festival in 2024, to promote its products.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Dua-Lipa-051026-a499836e43cc40068fd796b44d4aba6f.jpg)
The complaint, filed on May 8, 2025, outlines that the image in question features prominently on cardboard boxes containing televisions marketed across the United States. Lipa’s legal team argues that the utilisation of her likeness is misleading, implying that she endorses or has a connection to Samsung’s products. Consequently, she is seeking no less than $15 million in damages, as well as any profits associated with the sales of the televisions branded with her image.
Within the legal documents, it is stated that Lipa’s image was included in a significant marketing effort for the televisions without her consent or knowledge. The lawsuit alleges that the star did not authorise such use and would have unequivocally opposed it. It asserts that this action constitutes a violation of her right of publicity, suggesting that consumers were influenced to purchase the televisions based on her likeness being featured.
The filings detail examples of social media interactions demonstrating how potential customers were swayed by Lipa’s presence on the packaging. One fan noted that they had not initially intended to buy a television but changed their mind upon seeing the box featuring the singer’s image. Another user expressed that Lipa’s image on any product practically guarantees its sale, illustrating the extent of her star power in consumer decision-making.
Despite being notified of this alleged infringement and receiving multiple cease-and-desist communications from Lipa’s representatives, the lawsuit claims that Samsung chose to disregard the requests and has continued to use her image. The timeline indicated that the singer became aware of the supposed misuse in June 2025, yet the products remain available on the market to this day.
The legal documents further observe that the image at the centre of the dispute is officially registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, lending strength to the claim that Samsung’s actions constitute copyright infringement. Lipa’s representatives assert that the company has taken advantage of her status as a celebrity to advance its commercial interests without any compensation.
The complaint underscores that the actions taken by Samsung trivialise Lipa’s efforts in cultivating a strong personal brand, suggesting that using her likeness without consent not only breaches her rights but also undermines the work she has put into establishing her career.
As of now, there has been no immediate response from Samsung or Lipa’s representatives following the filing of the lawsuit. This case highlights critical issues around celebrity image rights and the responsibilities corporations have in seeking permission when leveraging public figures for marketing purposes.
The unfolding of this legal battle will undoubtedly attract attention from both the music industry and corporate sectors, as it raises significant questions regarding the intersection of copyright laws and personal branding in an increasingly commercialised entertainment landscape.