In a significant legal development, a judge has ruled in favour of Angelina Jolie, determining that she is not required to disclose private communications sought by her former husband, Brad Pitt. This ruling comes amidst their ongoing dispute regarding the Château Miraval winery, which the couple co-owned.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Angelina-Jolie-Brad-Pitt-050525-tout-99d567f98e8141ec88aae376535f0708.jpg)
On 5 May, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge rejected a request from Pitt’s legal team that would have compelled Jolie to hand over 22 private messages related to their ongoing winery dispute. These communications, Jolie’s legal representatives argued, are protected by attorney-client privilege. The judge’s decision aligns with a prior ruling by an appellate court, which had overturned an earlier order demanding the production of those messages.
Judge Ciny Pánuco commented that Pitt had “not met his burden” to demonstrate that the communications fell outside the protections afforded by attorney-client privilege. However, the judge did allow for the possibility that further investigation could provide new evidence to potentially challenge Jolie’s claims. This statement affirms that while the current evidence does not support Pitt’s case, the door remains open for future developments.
Pitt, aged 62, has been embroiled in a legal struggle with Jolie, aged 50, since 2022, stemming from her decision to sell her share in Château Miraval to a company associated with the Stoli Group. Pitt has contended that this sale constitutes a breach of an existing agreement which prohibited either party from selling their stake without the other’s consent. Jolie disputes the existence of such an agreement and has countersued, alleging that Pitt is conducting a “vindictive war” against her.
In the recent court ruling, Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy, expressed satisfaction with the outcome, highlighting Pitt’s attempts to access privileged communications as an infringement on Jolie’s rights. Murphy accused Pitt of seeking undue control over her correspondence with her legal advisors, stressing that the court had appropriately halted these attempts.
A source close to Pitt acknowledged the ruling but noted that the judge permitted his legal team the option to revisit the decision should new evidence come to light. They described Jolie’s extensive claims of privilege regarding her communications as being of particular interest to the ongoing case.
The overarching legal battle has seen its share of complexity, particularly with the allegations surrounding Pitt’s conduct. Jolie’s lawyers contend that Pitt’s refusal to buy her out of their shared business was linked to a non-disclosure agreement that she was unwilling to sign. They have alleged this agreement was designed to protect Pitt from scrutiny related to allegations of verbal and physical abuse during a flight in 2016. Though investigations were conducted, authorities did not pursue charges, and Jolie opted not to file any herself at that time.
Additionally, court documents show that Pitt is seeking $35 million in damages following Jolie’s 2021 sale of her stake in Miraval. The tensions have escalated to the point where both sides have filed suits and counter-suits, reflecting the complex and increasingly contentious nature of their post-marriage relationship.
In a series of emails filed as evidence, Jolie’s team outlined the burdens of producing documentation that Pitt is demanding. Their correspondence indicated that Pitt’s legal actions are the reason for the extensive nature of the information they must potentially provide. The communication suggests that Pitt is seeking damages not only related to the sale but also for supposed harm to the winery’s operations.
Furthermore, allegations have been made by Pitt’s lawyers claiming that shortly after Jolie divested her shares, her legal team purportedly proposed a mutual non-disparagement agreement during divorce negotiations, raising further questions about the intentions of both parties.
As the divorce proceedings play out, the couple continues to co-parent their six children: Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Knox and Vivienne. The two finalised their divorce in December 2024, nearly eight years after Jolie first filed for divorce in September 2016, marking the end of their high-profile relationship that has often attracted media attention.
The conflict over Château Miraval illustrates the ongoing complexities inherent in high-stakes separations, bringing to light issues surrounding financial agreements, personal conduct, and the need for privacy in legal matters. As the situation evolves, both Pitt and Jolie remain at a legal and emotional crossroads, with the future of their business ventures and family dynamics at stake.