An elderly woman from Vancouver has expressed her shock at being offered medical assistance in dying (MAiD) shortly after arriving at the hospital for treatment of severe pain. Miriam Lancaster, aged 84, visited the emergency department at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) in April 2025 after waking up to debilitating discomfort. She recounted the experience, highlighting how instead of receiving immediate medical assistance, she was presented with the option of euthanasia by a doctor who had yet to conduct any diagnostic tests.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Hospital-032826-2-552b39d75357438384a69417d160122a.jpg)
Lancaster, who was accompanied by her daughter, Jordan Weaver, said, “I just wanted to find out why I was in pain — I did not want to die.” The mention of MAiD came as a surprise and a profound shock to her, especially since she was seeking answers regarding her medical condition rather than contemplating end-of-life options.
The conversation surrounding MAiD is particularly significant in Canada, where it is legally permissible for eligible individuals to request assistance to end their lives under specific circumstances. However, Lancaster’s case raises ethical questions about the circumstances under which such discussions should occur. She had been experiencing acute pain, which she would later find out resulted from a hairline fracture in her pelvis, a condition caused by osteoporosis.
Weaver, recalling her mother’s experience, explained that the diagnosis of a fractured pelvis was difficult to ascertain initially. She expressed her concern regarding the potential implications of the doctor’s suggestion, noting the influence it could have had on anyone who might not have had an advocate present. “If I hadn’t been there, the doctor might have been able to manipulate,” she said.
After spending a week in VGH, Lancaster was moved to a different facility for further recovery, where she successfully healed without the need for surgical intervention. She has since enjoyed an active lifestyle, travelling extensively, including a climb up a volcano in Guatemala and participating in culinary classes in Mexico. Her journey has proven to be one of resilience and vitality, highlighting the importance of exploring treatment options before considering more drastic measures.
In response to the incident, Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH), which manages VGH, issued a statement reaffirming their commitment to the health and safety of all patients. They maintained that while staff may consider discussing MAiD based on their clinical judgement, it is not typical for emergency department personnel to initiate such conversations without a patient expressing a specific request for it.
“We are not aware of a conversation between the patient and emergency department physicians at Vancouver General Hospital related to Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD),” VCH stated, reinforcing the importance of patient confidentiality while encouraging individuals with concerns about their care to reach out to their Patient Care Quality Office.
Lancaster and Weaver have made it clear that, while they understand MAiD may be a valid option for certain patients, it should not be suggested hastily or without careful consideration. They believe that such discussions should only arise when explicitly requested by the patient themselves. In a video shared on social media by Amanda Achtman, the founder of the anti-euthanasia group Dying to Meet You, Lancaster expressed her astonishment, stating, “That was the last thing on my mind. I just wanted to find out why I was in pain.”
The public response to Lancaster’s story raises pressing questions about the protocols surrounding MAiD in Canada’s healthcare system, particularly in emergency settings. It underscores the need for proper training and guidelines for healthcare professionals to address sensitive issues with the utmost care and respect for the patient’s current state of mind and wishes.
Lancaster’s situation is not an isolated incident and points to an urgent dialogue within the medical community about the balance between respecting a patient’s autonomy and ensuring they receive appropriate care. As society grapples with the implications of MAiD, Lancaster’s pathway to recovery and her adventures post-treatment serve as a compelling reminder of the complexities involved in making decisions related to life and death in healthcare.