Sarah Paulson, the acclaimed actress known for her versatile roles, recently appeared on Chelsea Handler’s podcast, “Dear Chelsea,” where she candidly discussed perceptions regarding her appearance and her views on cosmetic procedures. During the episode, which aired on November 12, Paulson set the record straight concerning allegations that she has undergone cosmetic enhancements.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Sarah-Paulson-111226-2-6b176cf2b71947de9a1f48dd9e158f8a.jpg)
At the start of the conversation, Handler and Paulson reflected on their seating arrangement, with Handler teasing Paulson about which side of her face presented better. “I have a better side of my face,” Paulson declared, sparking a light-hearted discussion regarding the angles and perspectives of their photographs.
Handler posed the question of whether Paulson requested to be photographed from her preferred angle while working, to which the actress replied that she endeavours to be shot from her “good side” whenever possible. However, she acknowledged that certain roles, such as her portrayal of Aileen Wuornos in “Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story,” required her to be filmed from various angles, and she had to adapt accordingly.
Handler, intrigued by the concept of a “good side,” asked Paulson what exactly was less appealing about the other side of her face. Paulson explained that it appeared “just less sharp” and “a little softer.” She reassured listeners that she has not utilised any cosmetic treatments, stating, “I don’t put anything in my face. I have no goo in there.” Handler affirmed that Paulson, indeed, looks unchanged and authentic.
The conversation took a turn as Paulson highlighted the misconceptions rampant on social media, where many individuals believe she has undergone a variety of procedures, including injections to her lips and forehead. Defending her natural appearance, Paulson remarked, “Everyone thinks I have…I’ve done nothing to my face.” Handler echoed this sentiment, remarking that Paulson maintains her distinctive look and has no need for alterations. The discussion even hinted at a broader cultural shift, with Handler suggesting a possible backlash against plastic surgery.
In a previous interview with Pedro Pascal for “Interview Magazine,” Paulson shared her thoughts on the impact of theatre on her appearance. Anticipating that her headlining role in the play “Appropriate” might accelerate the ageing process of her skin, she reflected on the physical demands of performing eight shows a week. “If there’s anything that’s going to age me rapidly, it’s going back to the theatre,” she stated candidly.
Paulson remarked on the frequent facial expressions she must adopt during performances, emphasising the toll this might take on her appearance. “Sometimes I’m backstage doing this play, Appropriate, and I’m thinking, ‘Wow, I’m making these facial expressions multiple times a day all day for months on end. I’ve never had those lines in between my eyebrows,’” she shared. With humour, she concluded that she expected some of these new lines would become permanent after the run of the play.
The actress’s openness about her views on beauty standards and the pressure of appearances resonates with many in today’s society. Her comments reflect an increasing dialogue around authenticity in an industry often dominated by idealised beauty norms. Paulson’s decision to forgo cosmetic enhancements is a personal choice, embraced by her commitment to remain true to herself.
As public interest in celebrity culture continues to grow, so does the scrutiny surrounding their physical appearances. Paulson’s forthrightness may inspire others to consider embracing their natural selves and resist the societal pressures to conform to conventional beauty ideals. By advocating for authenticity, Sarah Paulson joins a growing movement of public figures challenging the narratives that dictate how success and beauty should be defined.
About the Author
