On 17 September 2026, President Donald Trump made a peculiar hypothetical remark during a gathering of over 100 hunters and outdoors enthusiasts in the White House Rose Garden. His comments, which included a comparison between electrocution and swimming with sharks, have drawn attention for their unusual premise and his longstanding aversion to these sea creatures.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/donald-trump-great-white-shark-091826-be116c512f1244d4a30cee73764442ae.jpg)
In addressing the crowd, which featured notable attendees such as Johnny Morris, founder of Bass Pro Shops, Trump illustrated his concerns over proposed regulations affecting boat manufacturers. He claimed that under the Biden administration, there was an effort to enforce the production of solely electric engines. “I said, ‘So if I’m in an electric boat and I see I’m going down and the water’s pouring in, so I know I’m gonna be electrocuted, but five yards away there are sharks. Do I take the electrocution or do I go swimming with the sharks?'” Trump recounted, ultimately stating he would opt for electrocution over the prospect of encountering the marine predators.
This whimsical analogy appears to be an extension of a narrative Trump’s supporters might have heard in previous campaign speeches. According to reports, he first introduced this shark scenario at an Iowa event in October 2023, reiterating the concept to audiences in various locations, including Las Vegas in June 2024. Trump acknowledged the attention his shark analogy generated, saying it brought amusement to many while simultaneously frustrating the press.
Trump’s turbulent relationship with the idea of sharks has been documented over the years. The president has not shied away from expressing his strong opinions on the subject, often resorting to mocking environmentalists who advocate for the protection of sharks. In one instance, while signing an executive order in February 2025 promoting plastic straws, he remarked that such items would not significantly harm sharks as they “munch their way through the ocean.”
At a White House Christmas event in December 2025, Trump further shared his thoughts about animal activists and environmentalists, disparaging those who advocate for sharks. “Normally the environmentalists and the animal rights people would say, ‘Oh, leave it alone. It’s such a wonderful…’ I don’t feel that way,” Trump stated, hinting at his more critical viewpoint while expressing fascination towards wildlife.
Interestingly, reports suggest that Trump’s fascination with sharks stems from personal experiences. Adult film star Stormy Daniels, who once alleged an affair with Trump during a turbulent period in 2024, claimed that he held a peculiar obsession with the creatures. In recounting an encounter from 2011, she mentioned entering Trump’s hotel room to find him engrossed in a documentary during Shark Week. “He is obsessed with sharks. Terrified of sharks,” she claimed, citing his supposed disdain for any charitable efforts that support them.
During his recent remarks in the Rose Garden, Trump also announced the cancellation of certain speed regulations for boats operating off the East Coast, which had been implemented to protect endangered North Atlantic right whales from vessel collisions. He inaccurately attributed these restrictions to a desire to shield sharks, describing the removal of the rule as a move toward common sense and increased enjoyment for boaters.
“The American boaters can now once again enjoy the open ocean and you can go slightly faster than 10 miles an hour, like 120 miles an hour if you’re crazy,” he proclaimed, emphasising the lifting of restrictions and encouraging responsible boating speeds.
Trump’s comments regarding sharks, while whimsical, reveal a deeper narrative concerning his environmental policies and attitudes towards wildlife. While he utilises anecdotes to connect with his base, his dismissive lens on marine life and advocacy for deregulation remain central themes in his discussions of conservation efforts.
In summary, Trump’s remarks in the Rose Garden serve as illustrative anecdotes reflecting both personal convictions and political rhetoric, while simultaneously showcasing a unique intertwining of comedy and critique in his approach to environmental regulations.