**Good Good Golf’s CEO Considers Legal Action Against Callaway After Controversial Ad Incident**
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Good-Good-CEO-Matt-Kendrick-082726-DN-d8aed5a9e53448b2b307821d90815a3a.jpg)

In the wake of a damaging advertising campaign and the subsequent fallout, Matt Kendrick, CEO and Co-Founder of Good Good Golf, has signalled that his company may pursue legal action against Callaway Golf. This announcement comes just a day after Callaway ended its partnership with the emerging brand following public backlash over a commercial that has been widely condemned for its portrayal of violence against women.

In a post on social media platform X, Kendrick expressed discontent regarding how Callaway has handled the situation, insinuating that the established golf company had orchestrated a public relations attempt to divert attention away from their own involvement. “Interesting that @CallawayGolf asks us to make an ad then approves it then asks us to take the fall then drops us in a coordinated media blitz and covers it up by giving a million dollars away thinking everyone will be ok with it,” Kendrick wrote early on August 28.
Following up on a comment from a user, Kendrick suggested he would “not oppose” suing Callaway “for every single penny they’re owed plus damages.” The ongoing dispute highlights a significant rift between the two companies, raised to prominence by the ad’s abrupt pull and the controversy surrounding it. A representative for Callaway did not respond to requests for comments on this matter.
The controversy stems from an advertisement that aired for a brief period before being removed. The ad featured Good Good co-founder Garrett Clark sprinting towards Alexis Miestowski, a fellow employee, before shoving her to the ground as she reached for a driver. The ad, intended as a parody of the movie *Obsession*, has drawn sharp criticism for its violent imagery towards women. In light of this backlash, Clark acknowledged in a subsequent video statement that the concept of the ad was poorly conceived, describing it as “super dumb” and “not the greatest idea.”
In response to the growing outrage, Callaway Golf announced that they would sever ties with Good Good, expressing concern over their content review process which they admitted had failed in this instance. “In this instance, our content review process was not comprehensive enough,” Callaway stated in an official announcement released on August 27. The company pledged to enhance their internal procedures to prevent similar issues from arising in the future.
As an additional measure to address the backlash, Callaway Golf committed to donating $1 million to organisations dedicated to preventing violence against women, providing resources for survivors, and advancing educational efforts in this field. The company went on to apologise, stating, “We sincerely apologise to everyone who was hurt, disappointed, or offended by this incident.”
The fallout from the incident has already affected Good Good’s commercial partnerships significantly. Major retailers, including Dick’s Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy, have chosen to remove Good Good merchandise from their stores in light of the controversy. Furthermore, Good Good has decided to withdraw its sponsorship of an upcoming PGA tournament, initially branded as the Good Good Championship, which was set to take place in Austin, Texas in November.
This series of events serves as a cautionary tale in the world of advertising, illustrating the fine line brands must navigate regarding the messages they portray. Both Kendrick’s willingness to pursue legal restitution from Callaway and the swift corporate response from the latter indicate the high stakes in play for both companies moving forward.
The situation continues to develop, and the ramifications for all parties involved remain to be seen, as the industry closely watches how this will affect both Good Good Golf’s aspirations and Callaway’s reputation. With both sides claiming to act in different interests, the legal and reputational outcomes of this situation could potentially reshape partnerships across the golf industry.
