Michael Fishman, renowned for his portrayal of DJ Conner on the beloved sitcom “Roseanne,” has recently addressed the controversy surrounding the show’s revival and the firing of its star, Roseanne Barr, in 2018. Fishman, now 44, has been vocal about his experiences on the show and the impact of Barr’s actions on its legacy.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Roseanne-Michael-Fishman-Reboot-Canceled-081026-DN--62a1371594ce483584546f81005743ea.jpg)

The original “Roseanne” series aired from 1988 to 1997, earning a devoted fanbase and critical acclaim for its portrayal of a working-class family. In 2018, a revival was launched, bringing back familiar faces, including Barr. However, shortly after its premiere, Barr was dismissed from the series due to a tweet that compared Valerie Jarrett, a former advisor to President Barack Obama, to an ape. Barr later stated that she was unaware of Jarrett’s race at the time and attributed her outburst to the effects of a sleep medication.

In a recent video response on social media, Fishman received a comment suggesting that Barr was unfairly treated and that her actions did not warrant such consequences. The commenter attributed her firing to what they termed as a “woke” culture that is intolerant of edgy humour. Fishman, however, took a moment to clarify his stance on the situation, asserting that such sentiments, while frequently encountered, needed addressing.
“The comment I see so often is based on ignorance,” Fishman remarked, sharing his frustration over repeated encounters with similar narratives. “Over the past eight years, I’ve typically chosen to remain silent. However, after considerable reflection, I feel there is a need to challenge the misrepresentation of events.” He highlighted that some comments had veered towards threats but acknowledged that this particular one had not crossed that line.
Fishman stated, “Barr herself acknowledged that her comments were indefensible, which illustrates the gravity of the situation. Justifying harmful remarks leads to significant and real-world repercussions.” He pointed out that the real damage caused by dehumanising statements extends beyond the individual who made them, affecting communities and individuals who suffer the consequences of such rhetoric.
The actor indicated his belief in the importance of freedom of speech, yet he underscored that this freedom does not exempt individuals from accountability. “Comedians often tackle dark themes, but in this instance, there was no comedic intent—just harm and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes,” Fishman commented, asserting that the decision to cancel the show was justified.
Moreover, while Fishman expressed his disappointment in Barr’s actions, he maintained his respect and affection for her as an individual. “People are not defined solely by their mistakes. I will always recognise the good in her, even as I acknowledge the harm caused by her words,” he said. He emphasised the necessity of compassion alongside accountability, reminding viewers that everyone is capable of missteps.
Continually advocating for responsible discourse, he implored individuals who respond defensively to such controversies to reconsider their words. “It’s vital to think before speaking or posting,” Fishman cautioned. “Words carry weight, and many of us navigate their repercussions daily. That’s a significant part of free speech.”
The events of 2018 had a profound impact on the show’s legacy and the television landscape as a whole. Following Barr’s dismissal, a spin-off series titled “The Conners” was commissioned, maintaining the core cast without Barr. ABC’s President at the time, Channing Dungey, described Barr’s tweet as “abhorrent” and inconsistent with the network’s values, leading to the show’s abrupt cancellation.
“The Conners,” featuring actors such as John Goodman, Laurie Metcalf, and Sara Gilbert, ran successfully for seven seasons from 2018 to 2025, navigating its storyline without the presence of Barr’s character, who was written off in a plotline implicating the opioid crisis.
Fishman’s thoughtful insights contribute to an ongoing dialogue about accountability, freedom of expression, and the societal impacts of comedy. As he continues to reflect on his experiences, fans and observers alike are reminded of the delicate balance between humour and responsibility in the public sphere.
