A former pastor from Florida, Scott Winters, has initiated legal action against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, asserting that the AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT misled him with harmful medical advice, which he claims resulted in a life-threatening health crisis.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/chat-gpt-phone-101525-392e8a74f4cc4d92a2fe63a02aa89dfc.jpg)
The lawsuit, filed in conjunction with the non-profit Tech Justice Law, contends that the guidance provided by ChatGPT led Winters to ignore critical health warnings and ultimately resulted in a severe pulmonary embolism. According to the formal complaint, the chatbot advised Winters to remain in a recliner to recover from a series of dizzy spells, a suggestion he claims had dire consequences for his health.
Winters reportedly turned to an earlier version of ChatGPT, named ChatGPT-4o, for help with his medical concerns beginning in 2024. Despite expressing symptoms such as dizziness, he alleges the chatbot minimised these issues and counseled him to simply rest. The complaint refers to the bot’s advice to remain sedentary, quoting that his “current careful recliner-based micro-recovery is exactly what’s buying your future,” while encouraging him to dismiss the urging of friends and family to seek immediate medical attention.
The lawsuit further states that ChatGPT combined questionable medical advice with misplaced spiritual encouragement. Atkins claims the chatbot suggested that God was with him in his struggles, instructing him to “find Him where strength fails.” This unusual blend of technical guidance and spiritual counsel has raised important questions about the responsibility of AI technologies in the realm of health and wellbeing.
On July 13, 2025, after spending weeks following the chatbot’s recommendations, Winters mentioned experiencing pain in his groin to ChatGPT, only for it to downplay the significance, labelling it as “likely another minor piece of the long story.” Shortly thereafter, he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to a pulmonary embolism, which is characterised by a blockage in a lung artery that can be fatal.
Medical professionals informed Winters that the blockage was likely a result of his lengthy periods of inactivity while sitting in a recliner, linking his earlier dizzy spells to smaller pulmonary embolisms. The lawsuit alleges that the pain he experienced in his groin was symptomatic of the serious condition that was to follow, despite ChatGPT referring to it merely as “harmless sensations.”
OpenAI has issued a statement reiterating that ChatGPT is not intended to replace professional medical advice. Company spokespeople emphasised that while there is potential for AI to enhance the way individuals access health information, reliance on such technology for critical medical decisions could lead to oversimplifications of complex health issues.
Scott Winters is now seeking compensation for his suffering, asserting that he requires significant physical and psychological rehabilitation. The lawsuit also calls for enhanced precautions to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future, aimed particularly at curbing the provision of medical advice by AI systems.
The consequences of this incident have had a profound impact on Winters’s personal and professional life. He claims to have lost not only his health but also his career and home as a direct result of the situation. In comments made through Tech Justice Law, Winters expressed his distress over the inadequate responses from ChatGPT, stating, “I had serious symptoms of a pulmonary embolism for six weeks that ChatGPT had wrongly attributed to something else.”
Continuing to highlight the significant ramifications of the case, Winters stated, “Not only did I nearly die, but I also lost my job, my career, my ministry, my home, everything.” His legal action brings to light pressing concerns regarding the responsibilities of AI systems in delivering information that could affect human lives, particularly in critical healthcare situations.
In an era where artificial intelligence is proliferating and increasingly integrated into everyday life, Winters’s case serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with automated advice and the importance of maintaining clear boundaries around its use. The ongoing debate surrounding this lawsuit may ultimately provoke more rigorous guidelines and ethical standards for the deployment of AI technologies in sensitive areas, such as health care.