Karen Read, a woman recently acquitted of murder, has spoken candidly about her life in the aftermath of her high-profile trial, her ongoing legal battles, and her belief that John O’Keefe, her late partner, was a victim of institutional misconduct. In an exclusive interview with the ‘Today’ show, Read expressed her conviction that the perception of her guilt is not as widespread as some might think.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Karen-Read-on-Her-New-Lawsuit-060526-1-147955306cbd49159a36a48499af5b07.jpg)
During the live broadcast, Read revealed that she has yet to meet anyone in person who believes her guilty of killing O’Keefe, a Boston police officer, despite criticism she receives online. “I’ve not had any evidence that there’s lots of people who feel that way,” she maintained, indicating that her personal experiences since the trial have been overwhelmingly positive.
Read’s acquittal came after a tumultuous series of legal battles. Her first trial in 2024 ended without a verdict, resulting in a mistrial due to a hung jury. Ultimately, she was acquitted of the murder charge but convicted of driving while intoxicated. The case’s complexities saw Read accused of hitting O’Keefe with her SUV and leaving him to succumb to the elements on a freezing winter night in January 2022. Read has consistently denied the allegations, asserting that O’Keefe was killed after entering a residence and contending that she has been wrongfully accused.
In an effort to confront her past and the investigations into O’Keefe’s death, Read filed a new lawsuit against the Massachusetts State Police and the Canton Police Department on June 4. This lawsuit alleges misconduct and bias, portraying a culture of systemic failure within the investigating agencies. “This was always our plan, that I had to save my own life first,” Read explained in her interview. “I can’t do anything if I’m not free. I had to fight for my freedom for years.”
Read’s attorney, Alan Jackson, emphasised that the lawsuit is not solely aimed at seeking financial compensation but is also about bringing to light what he describes as “corruption” within the police departments involved in the case. He highlighted communications between police officers that allegedly demonstrate a culture of bias against Read. One of the lead investigators, Michael Proctor, was terminated for sharing inappropriate messages during the investigation, which Read claims contributed to the wrongful perception of her culpability.
As she continues to navigate her new life following her trial, Read has shared that she currently does not have a job and is still without a driving license. Nonetheless, she remains dedicated to her case, stating, “I want this to be over, but it’s not done yet.” Despite the ongoing turmoil, Read has maintained that her efforts are focused on ensuring justice for O’Keefe, whom she views as a central figure in her fight against alleged institutional corruption.
The public response to her situation has been divisive, with visible groups of supporters and detractors attending her trials. Read has noted the stark contrast in her supporters, who often wore pink shirts, while those opposed to her case donned blue. She remarked, “Yes, there were maybe for every pink shirt, there was someone in a blue shirt who had many ties to people on the other side of this case.”
In addition to her current suit against the police, Read faces a wrongful death lawsuit from O’Keefe’s family, which she has publicly declined to discuss, stating, “I don’t have anything to say to his family.” Reflecting on her relationship with O’Keefe, Read described him as “easygoing” and profoundly dedicated to his family, especially to the niece and nephew he helped raise after their parents passed away.
Looking ahead, Read is determined to continue speaking out about her experiences. “I think it would be a waste for me to just disappear and go live on an island,” she asserted, despite joking that she would welcome a peaceful retreat. Her resolve to address the broader implications of her case—including the consequences of alleged police bias—underscores her commitment to advocating for what she believes is a vital cause.
As Read prepares to fight for justice, she is adamant that the memory of O’Keefe remains a central motivation for her actions. “John was the victim of this institutional corruption,” Read stated resolutely. As her story unfolds further, it becomes clear that the battle for truth, justice, and accountability continues to shape her life far beyond the courtroom.