Epstein Victim Accuses Palace of Protecting Ex-Prince Andrew Over Leaked Confidential Information for Years

**Buckingham Palace Faces Allegations Over Prince Andrew’s Conduct**

In recent developments surrounding Prince Andrew, Buckingham Palace is once again under scrutiny due to allegations that the ex-royal shared confidential government information during his tenure as a trade envoy. Evidence of this misconduct was reportedly provided to the palace in 2020, prompting questions about the institution’s response to serious allegations involving one of its senior members.

Andrew, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor following the stripping of his royal titles in 2022, was arrested in February 2025 on suspicion of misconduct in public office. This marked a significant moment in royal history, as it was the first time a senior British royal had faced arrest since the execution of King Charles I in 1649.

According to reports from the BBC, the Lord Chamberlain, the highest-ranking official within the royal household, received around 30,000 emails in 2020 detailing Andrew’s alleged sharing of protected information with business contacts. These emails have raised further concerns about the former royal’s actions and the palace’s decision to withhold crucial information from the public and authorities alike.

Buckingham Palace has refrained from commenting on the ongoing police investigation, citing the sensitive nature of the inquiry. When approached by the BBC, a palace spokesperson stated, “Since there is an ongoing police enquiry concerning Mr. Mountbatten-Windsor, it is not possible to provide any comment on these matters.”

Jess Michaels, a former dancer who claims to have been sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein in 1991, has vocally condemned the palace’s inaction. She revealed her thoughts in an interview with The Telegraph, where she remarked, “Six years ago, the palace knew Andrew wasn’t just a problem: he could face a criminal investigation. And they sat on it.” Her statement shed light on a culture of protecting powerful figures while neglecting the victims of their actions.

Michaels further expressed her heartbreak over the tragic plight of Virginia Giuffre, another victim who had accused Andrew of sexual assault. Giuffre, who passed away by suicide in April 2025, had claimed that she was sexually exploited by Andrew on multiple occasions, the first happening when she was just 17 years old. In her posthumously published memoir, Giuffre elaborated on these allegations, which Andrew has consistently denied.

In his public life, Andrew had stepped back from royal duties in 2019 following a contentious interview with the BBC, where he attempted to refute Giuffre’s claims. The fallout from this interview was severe; he was stripped of military titles and royal patronages shortly thereafter. His various legal battles culminated in a settlement with Giuffre for an undisclosed sum, an outcome that many interpreted as an unofficial admission of guilt.

Following his arrest in February, Andrew was held in police custody for approximately 11 hours before being released. The investigation looked specifically at his relationships with Jeffrey Epstein and the sharing of sensitive information obtained while serving as a trade envoy. Police have stated that inquiries regarding claims of sexual misconduct, particularly connected to an event in Windsor in 2010, remain active.

Commenting on the bizarre circumstances surrounding Andrew’s appointment as a trade envoy, royal author Robert Jobson suggested that Queen Elizabeth II had facilitated Andrew’s position despite concerns raised by Charles, the current monarch. At that time, Charles reportedly believed his brother was ill-equipped for such a role, as he had only recently exited the Navy. Jobson noted that Andrew’s appointment was a consequence of the former Queen’s desire to bolster her son’s career.

This latest round of allegations and investigations raises broader questions about accountability, particularly how institutions handle power dynamics that often favour influential individuals over those who have suffered due to their actions. With mounting pressure on Buckingham Palace to address these issues, the public is left awaiting clarity in a case that intertwines royal legacy with serious allegations of misconduct.

As events transpire, the inquiry’s findings and implications for Andrew, as well as the royal family, may instigate further discussions around systemic protection within prominent institutions. The tale of privilege and power within the monarchy continues to unfold as the public seeks transparency and restitution for the victims involved.