A German family’s dream holiday in a luxury Greek resort took an unexpected turn, ultimately leading to a legal payout of approximately $1,200 due to their inability to secure pool loungers during their stay. The case, which was brought before the Hanover District Court, highlighted issues surrounding holiday expectations and poolside etiquette at popular tourist destinations.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/hotel-pool-empty-chairs-51126-0a8aeda9550d4aa9b16cf0489a38b439.jpg)
The family booked an 11-night vacation at the Grecotel Kos Imperial resort on the island of Kos in August 2024, with their overall expenses around £8,500. This celebrated resort boasts an impressive lagoon pool complex, numerous swimming pools, and a lazy river meandering through lush vegetation, seemingly an ideal spot for a relaxing family getaway.
However, upon arrival, the family encountered a persistent problem: every sun bed by the pool was reserved by towels long before they were even able to claim a spot. The German tourist reported that each day they arrived at the pool by 8 or 9 a.m., only to find all loungers claimed. On one fortunate occasion, they managed to secure two loungers, which left his two children, aged 9 and 12, forced to lie on towels on the ground.
The issue of reserving sun loungers is not uncommon in Europe, especially in high-demand locations. Many tourists have taken to social media to share their frustrations, even documenting their early morning ventures to claim prime sunbeds. Regulations exist at many resorts to prevent this behaviour; however, the enforcement can often be inconsistent, leading to dissatisfaction among guests.
At the Grecotel Kos Imperial, signs clearly prohibited the reservation of loungers for more than 30 minutes. Despite this, a witness who accompanied the family testified that they spent over 20 minutes each day searching for available loungers amidst blazing temperatures, only to find rows of empty beds covered in towels—with no one using them. The family eventually sought guidance from their tour operator, TUI Deutschland, only to be informed that the responsibility for enforcement lay with the hotel staff.
Following two complaints to the hotel regarding the situation, the family’s concerns were not addressed adequately, resulting in the father deciding to take legal action. Initially, he received a partial refund but felt it necessary to pursue the matter further. The court eventually ruled in favour of the family, citing that the absence of loungers constituted a breach of the contract as per the German Civil Code.
The law stipulates that when a travel organiser fails to provide agreed-upon amenities, the customer is entitled to a price reduction for the duration of the defect. In this instance, the court deemed the family’s inability to access loungers for a significant portion of their holiday warranted a 15% refund for each day they were unable to use the chairs, culminating in the awarded amount of $1,200.
Interestingly, TUI Deutschland is unable to challenge the court’s decision as the payout is below a specific legal threshold, effectively making the ruling final. This case sheds light on the importance of ensuring promised services are delivered, particularly in the highly competitive tourism industry.
As the holiday season approaches, this incident may resonate with many who plan vacations to popular resorts, raising questions around the establishment and enforcement of poolside policies. The balance between guest satisfaction and fair usage of shared spaces continues to be a topic of discussion within the hospitality sector.
PEOPLE has reached out to both TUI Deutschland and Grecotel Kos Imperial for their comments on the matter, but it remains unclear how the incident may affect their operational policies moving forward. In an ever-evolving travel landscape, this case serves as a reminder of the potential legal implications of holiday arrangements and the expectations consumers hold when booking their dream retreats.