Republican Leader Mike Johnson’s ‘Role Model’ Pick to Replace ‘Terrible’ Bad Bunny at Super Bowl Is Exactly Who You’d Expect

Mike Johnson Suggests Alternative ‘Role Model’ for Super Bowl Halftime Performance

House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed his preference for a different artist to perform during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, rather than Puerto Rican sensation, Bad Bunny. The Republican leader labelled Bad Bunny’s selection as a “terrible decision” and advocated for a performer who aligns more with his beliefs and values.

During a press conference outside the House chambers, Johnson, who admitted to being unfamiliar with Bad Bunny, criticised the choice, stating, “It sounds like he’s not someone who appeals to a broader audience. And there are so many eyes on the Super Bowl—for a lot of young and impressionable children.” This sentiment highlights Johnson’s desire for a performer he deems more suitable and inspirational for the event.

In contrast to Bad Bunny, Johnson proposed artists like Lee Greenwood as a more fitting option for the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show. The 82-year-old singer, known for hits like “God Bless the U.S.A.,” has a longstanding reputation aligned with conservative values and patriotism. Johnson’s endorsement of Greenwood reflects his preference for performers who embody what he considers to be positive role models.

Former President Donald Trump also weighed in on the selection of Bad Bunny for the Super Bowl performance, expressing his disbelief and criticism of the decision. Trump, in an interview on Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports, labelled the choice as “absolutely ridiculous” and questioned the rationale behind it. This echoes Johnson’s sentiments and underscores a shared perspective on the entertainment choice.

In addition to Johnson and Trump’s disapproval, Cory Lewandowski, a key figure in Trump’s political campaigns, confirmed the presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at the 2026 Super Bowl. Lewandowski emphasised the administration’s stance on illegal immigration, stating that no venue, including the Super Bowl, would offer sanctuary to those in the country unlawfully. This stance reflects a stricter approach to enforcement under the current administration.

Bad Bunny, on his part, has previously expressed concerns over the Trump administration’s immigration policies. The reggaeton artist cited the fear of ICE presence as a reason for avoiding the U.S. during his tours, indicating a reluctance to perform in an environment he deemed potentially threatening. This highlights a clear divergence in views between the artist and political figures like Johnson and Trump.

Despite the controversy surrounding Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance and differing opinions on suitable entertainers, the debate sparked by Johnson’s remarks underscores the intersection of politics and entertainment. The discussion not only sheds light on varying perspectives within the public sphere but also raises questions about the role of artists and performers in societal events like the Super Bowl.

As discussions continue around the Super Bowl halftime show and potential performers, the clash of opinions between political figures and artists like Bad Bunny highlights broader cultural divides. The debate serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in popular entertainment choices and the diverse viewpoints that shape public discourse.