FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Praises TV Stations for Refusing to Air Jimmy Kimmel Live!
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Brendan-Carr-2025-Concordia-Annual-Summit-jimmy-kimmel-live-092225-bbe1063f47584f57bbea1d7f4f2ece00.jpg)

In recent news, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has voiced his approval of TV stations that have chosen not to air Jimmy Kimmel Live!. After ABC announced the return of the late-night show to air, Carr took to social media platform X to share his thoughts on the matter. Carr’s statements come in the wake of Kimmel’s controversial remarks about late right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk.

Disney revealed that Jimmy Kimmel Live! would be back on television screens on Tuesday, Sept. 23, almost a week after it was initially pulled indefinitely. Despite this announcement, broadcast companies Nexstar and Sinclair have opted to continue preempting the show on their affiliate stations. Carr highlighted Sinclair’s decision to keep preempting Jimmy Kimmel Live! on its stations, leading to a series of reactions on social media.
In response to a comment from Democratic California State Senator Scott Wiener, who suggested breaking up Sinclair, Carr accused the Democrats of ‘Projection and Distortion’ on Kimmel’s show. He claimed that Democrats have a history of silencing dissent using government power and are looking to deflect blame away from Disney and local TV stations for Kimmel’s suspension. Carr emphasised the importance of empowering local TV stations to make decisions that align with their communities’ needs.
Following Carr’s remarks, Nexstar, the largest local broadcast and digital media company in the U.S., also announced its decision to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live!. Carr had previously warned ABC of potential FCC action in response to Kimmel’s comments, which he deemed offensive. Kimmel had made controversial remarks about the politicisation of Charlie Kirk’s death, leading to widespread backlash.
Carr’s stance on the issue has received mixed reactions, with some users pointing out past posts where he advocated against government censorship of speech. Carr’s defence of TV stations pressuring ABC to act against Kimmel’s show has sparked a debate on free speech and media regulation. Despite criticisms, Carr remains firm in his belief that local TV stations should cater to their local communities’ interests.
As the debate continues, Jimmy Kimmel has not directly addressed the situation but has garnered support from industry figures and fellow late-night hosts. The controversy surrounding Kimmel’s remarks underscores the broader tensions around free speech, media ethics, and political polarisation in the current media landscape. Carr’s vocal stance on the matter has added fuel to the ongoing discussions about the role of regulators in safeguarding free speech while holding media entities accountable for their content.
The saga involving Jimmy Kimmel Live! serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding media regulation, political commentary, and public discourse in the digital age. With stakeholders from all sides weighing in on the matter, the debate is far from over. As Carr continues to navigate these challenging waters as FCC Chairman, his actions and statements will undoubtedly shape the future trajectory of media regulation in the United States.
