Denise Richards Files to Vacate Aaron Phypers and Family from Home, Claims They’re Being Evicted After He Failed to Pay Rent

Denise Richards Seeks Eviction of Aaron Phypers and Family from Shared Home

Denise Richards has taken legal action by filing court documents on August 19th to request a judge’s order for her ex-husband, Aaron Phypers, and his family to vacate her Calabasas residence. The actress alleges that Phypers stopped paying rent, leading to the eviction, and she needs access to retrieve her personal belongings and dogs without violating the existing temporary restraining order. Richards, aged 54, had previously accused Phypers of physical abuse, resulting in the restraining order.

The ongoing divorce proceedings between Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers have taken a new turn with Richards’ attempt to regain access to the property. In the court documents obtained by PEOPLE, Richards claims that despite both names being on the lease, she had moved out of the house two years prior under the understanding that Phypers’ family would only temporarily reside there. She asserts that Phypers committed to handling the rent independently back in January when they were still residing in the house.

On July 24th, Richards was notified that eviction procedures would commence on August 23rd. The landlord reached out to Richards, reporting multiple unsuccessful attempts to contact Phypers regarding unpaid rent, necessitating the eviction action. As per the filing, Richards left personal and sentimental items at the property based on Phypers’ assurance that his family would relocate, allowing them to move back in. She expresses concern that her dogs and property may be at risk of harm or disposal during the eviction process.

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills alum detailed significant damage to the property allegedly caused by Phypers and his family, portraying the home as being in a state of disarray. Photos accompanying the filing show damaged flooring and scattered belongings, highlighting the deteriorated condition in Richards’ absence. She emphasizes the urgency of the situation, citing fears for her safety and the safety of her possessions if immediate action is not taken.

In a previous incident on August 3rd, authorities were called to the Calabasas property when Richards attempted to retrieve her dogs, believing Phypers to be absent. However, Phypers was present at the time, leading to a confrontation between the former spouses. Richards narrates an encounter involving Phypers’ family members obstructing her departure from the property, raising concerns over potential violations of the restraining order. She stresses the need for a safe retrieval of her belongings and pets through court intervention.

Amidst the divorce proceedings, Denise Richards has leveled allegations of domestic violence against Aaron Phypers, which he vehemently denies, stating that the claims are baseless. Richards’ court documents outline a pattern of abusive behaviour, including physical assaults, threats, and emotional manipulation, which she regards as enduring throughout their marriage. Phypers refutes these accusations, asserting his innocence and condemning the allegations as false and damaging.

The legal dispute between Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers continues to unfold, shedding light on the complexities of their fractured relationship and the challenges faced in separating their shared assets. The court’s eventual ruling on Richards’ petition to reclaim her property and ensure her safety amidst the ongoing conflict with Phypers and his family remains pending. The developments in this high-profile case underscore the importance of addressing domestic disputes through a legal framework to uphold the rights and safety of all parties involved.

The public attention drawn to this legal battle serves as a reminder of the complexities that can arise in divorce proceedings, especially when allegations of domestic abuse are involved. The case underscores the importance of ensuring the protection and well-being of individuals in such situations, highlighting the need for appropriate legal remedies to address disputes and safeguard the rights of those affected.