Ryan Reynolds’ Rep Dismisses Justin Baldoni’s Claims in Bold Statement
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/blake-lively-ryan-reynolds-justin-baldoni-013125-2-5ef80971aabe44a5bda847ec8b567912.jpg)

The ongoing legal battle between Ryan Reynolds and Justin Baldoni has taken a new turn as Reynolds’ legal team filed a motion to dismiss Baldoni’s defamation lawsuit. In response to Baldoni’s complaint, the Deadpool star’s attorneys argue that the claims made against Reynolds do not hold legal merit. The lawsuit stems from allegations that Reynolds referred to Baldoni as a “predator” in private conversations, a statement that Reynolds allegedly believed to be true.
According to Reynolds’ attorneys, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, the key issue lies in whether Reynolds genuinely believed the statement he made. The legal team points out that the complaint fails to provide evidence that Reynolds did not hold the belief that Baldoni was a predator. The motion also references allegations made by Reynolds’ wife, Blake Lively, accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation during their collaboration on the film “It Ends With Us.”

In a fiery statement, Reynolds’ spokesperson dismissed Baldoni’s lawsuit as an attempt to discredit Reynolds for upholding the values Baldoni claims to advocate for. The rep labelled the claims as a list of grievances aimed at attacking Reynolds for being the man Baldoni portrays himself to be – a man who listens to and supports the women in his life. Reynolds’ legal team expressed confidence in the dismissal of the lawsuit and hinted at seeking compensation for the costs incurred in the litigation process.
Baldoni, known for his work as a director and actor, filed a $400 million lawsuit against Reynolds, Lively, their publicist Leslie Sloane, and Sloane’s PR firm Vision PR, Inc. The lawsuit was triggered by behind-the-scenes conflicts during the production of “It Ends With Us.” The legal battle has revealed a complex web of allegations and counterclaims involving the three prominent figures in the entertainment industry.
The ongoing dispute has seen Lively filing an updated version of her initial lawsuit, implicating two unidentified female co-stars who are said to testify against Baldoni’s alleged misconduct on the film set. Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, dismissed Lively’s claims as lacking substance, emphasising the absence of concrete evidence or public support for her allegations. Mediation attempts between the parties have been labelled as premature, with trials set to commence in March 2026.
Reynolds’ motion alludes to claims of financial backing from billionaire Steve Sarowitz, who allegedly pledged up to $100 million to tarnish the reputations of Reynolds and Lively. The unfolding legal saga underscores the high stakes and complexities involved in celebrity lawsuits, shedding light on the challenges and intricacies of navigating legal disputes in the public eye.
As the legal battle intensifies, both sides have remained steadfast in their positions, with each party seeking to uphold their reputations and seek justice through the legal system. The outcome of the lawsuits remains uncertain, with the entertainment industry closely following the developments as they unfold. The clash between Reynolds, Lively, and Baldoni serves as a reminder of the complexities and controversies that can arise within the realms of fame and celebrity.
In a statement, Reynolds’ legal team reiterated their commitment to defending his reputation and rights, asserting that the lawsuit brought against him is unwarranted and lacks legal grounds. The legal saga involving Reynolds, Lively, and Baldoni continues to unravel, captivating audiences and industry insiders alike with its twists and turns.
