**Elon Musk’s Ex-Girlfriend Shares Insights in New Documentary**
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/ashley-st-clair-elon-musk-051926-89930638c3794d658843aecef6828ce5.jpg)
In a revealing new documentary entitled *Musk*, released on 16 October, former conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair shares her personal experiences during her tumultuous relationship with billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. St. Clair, who is also the mother of Musk’s son, Romulus, offers a glimpse into her world, highlighting a dramatic turn in their relationship following the birth of their child.
St. Clair, aged 28, reflects on her initial connection with Musk, describing how their relationship began on social media. “When Elon started interacting with me on Twitter, I was a conservative influencer. He was responding to my posts frequently,” she recalls, detailing an early conversation in which Musk suggested she should have more children following one of her Mother’s Day posts.
The former couple’s romance swiftly escalated; she recounts being whisked away on a private jet after Musk expressed an interest in visiting Providence, Rhode Island. During this time, she noted that Musk displayed both intelligence and respect, albeit with a somewhat eccentric personality. “We were in this hotel and I’m falling asleep with him while he’s listening to an audiobook about Kublai Khan,” she said, indicating her surprise at his unusual bedtime choice.
However, St. Clair’s narrative takes a darker turn after the birth of their son. She describes how Musk’s demeanor transformed significantly following Romulus’s arrival. St. Clair alleges that he was kind initially but showed a different side to her once they became parents. “It was almost as if he didn’t show a certain side of himself until after I had our baby,” she states in the documentary.
According to the film, Musk abruptly reduced the financial support he provided to St. Clair after she disclosed their child’s existence to the public. St. Clair recounts negotiations regarding a nondisclosure agreement that she ultimately refused to sign, citing it as a child support agreement with a lump sum offer of £15 million and monthly payments of £100,000. Following her public comments, Musk reportedly slashed her monthly allowance to £40,000.
The legal battle for custody of their son further complicated matters. St. Clair, seeking full custody, finds herself embroiled in an ongoing dispute as Musk expressed his intention to contest her request in court. The documentary highlights the strain their relationship endured, emphasising the psychological toll of navigating both parenthood and legal challenges.
St. Clair also alludes to Musk’s interactions with other women, revealing that he allegedly sent direct messages to multiple individuals, offering the prospect of having children with him. She comments on the situation with incredulity, suggesting that Musk’s approach was indiscriminate and prominent. “It’s like a Gatling gun of sperm in his DMs,” she remarked, referencing one particular case of a woman in Japan who reportedly sought sperm donation.
Despite Musk’s absence from the film and his derogatory comments regarding the documentary’s production, director Alex Gibney aimed to present a multifaceted view of the billionaire. Gibney’s documentary includes interviews with Musk’s former partners and family members, attempting to highlight the implications of Musk’s immense power across various sectors, including business and technology.
Musk, 55, has faced criticism for his management style and interpersonal relationships. His representatives labelled Gibney’s documentary a “hit piece” and threatened legal action due to alleged inaccuracies. In response, Gibney has defended his portrayal of Musk, detailing his journey as a public figure while focusing on the impact he has had on those closest to him.
As *Musk* raises pertinent questions about the implications of fame and power, St. Clair stands firm in her decision to publicly expose her experiences. Her insights reflect a struggle not only for personal autonomy but also highlight the broader themes of control and influence in relationships with high-profile individuals. As the documentary continues to spark conversation, it reveals the inner complexities of navigating such prominent public relationships and the costs associated with them.