The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently looking into an alarming incident that occurred at New York City’s LaGuardia Airport, where a small business jet nearly collided with a Delta Airlines aircraft during landing. The close call took place on 7 October, when the business jet initiated take-off from an intersecting runway while the Delta flight was on approach.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/delta-air-lines-airbus-031925-3e067454fbbd4ace9292ab3581813565.jpg)
According to FAA representatives, the regional Delta flight, identified as Endeavor Air Flight 5415, was attempting to land at approximately 3:55 PM local time when the smaller jet, designated ExecJet Flight 398, began its ascent without the necessary clearance from air traffic control. The Delta flight was forced to execute an emergency manoeuvre known as a “go-around” to prevent a potential collision.

Data from flight tracking services indicated that the two aircraft came alarmingly close to one another, at one point within 1,000 feet vertically. The Delta plane, reportedly travelling at around 147 miles per hour, initiated the go-around just before it was set to touch down. Fortunately, the passenger jet managed to land safely a short time later.

The FAA confirmed the details of the incident in a statement, emphasising the serious breach of protocol that permitted the ExecJet to take off without clearance. A spokesperson for the agency stated that the “event is under investigation,” highlighting the importance of ensuring safety in air traffic operations.
In a statement to news outlets, a Delta representative acknowledged the incident, confirming that the flight crew had executed a go-around in order to maintain appropriate separation from the departing aircraft. They assured the public that safety is always the utmost priority.
Audio recordings from air traffic control, which have been made public, reveal a dialogue between the business jet’s pilot and the air traffic controller, where there appears to be a disagreement regarding the take-off clearance. The air traffic controller firmly stated, “I believe you were never cleared for take-off, sir. You were cleared to line up and wait.” In response, the pilot contested this, asserting that they had received clearance to depart.
Unfortunately, the exchange escalated when the air traffic controller responded, “Uh, negative. I never even said anything about wake turbulence,” suggesting that the pilot’s understanding of their clearance was mistaken. As the conversation continued, the controller requested that the pilot review the recorded communications to clarify the issue.
Incidents like these, while rare, underscore the critical nature of communication and adherence to protocols within the aviation industry. The FAA’s investigation aims to ascertain the events leading up to this near miss, with the objective of preventing similar occurrences in the future.
Experts in aviation safety have weighed in on the matter, stressing that any deviation from established procedures can lead to life-threatening situations. They believe that this incident serves as a stark reminder for both pilots and air traffic controllers about the need for vigilance and clarity in communication at all times.
As the investigation unfolds, the FAA is expected to release further details regarding any findings or recommendations arising from this hazardous episode. The event has raised substantial public interest, prompting discussions on aviation safety practices and the importance of stringent enforcement of regulations to ensure the welfare of passengers and crew alike.
