**Trump’s Unruly Comments Target CNN Journalist at UN General Assembly**
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Donald-Trump-Kaitlan-Collins-060326-acde4f76efb9425f858309eed13bdc76.jpg)
In a remarkable outburst late Tuesday, September 22, President Donald Trump took to social media to express his disdain for CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins, labelling her a “sleazebag”. This incident followed a heated exchange at the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, where Trump criticized both Collins and her network for their presence at the event.

The situation escalated when Trump posted on Truth Social, where he claimed that Collins, described as a “Third Rate Reporter”, had declared that she would not be covering him. He questioned her presence at the U.N. by saying, “Then why were they ranting and raving like Lunatics, in the Press Area, at the United Nations? Why was she there?”

This tirade wasn’t an isolated occurrence, as Trump has publicly targeted Collins on multiple occasions over the past year. His comments ranged from branding her as “stupid” and “nasty” to insinuating that she harboured “hatred” towards him. The president’s remarks have consistently underscored a combative relationship with the media, particularly outlets he deems unfriendly.
During the U.N. General Assembly, Collins had the opportunity to pose a significant question about the status of the conflict with Iran, referencing a poll indicating widespread discontent among the American public regarding U.S. involvement. Trump, upon answering, expressed surprise at CNN’s presence, asserting, “You said you weren’t going to cover me. You shouldn’t be covering me.”
In response, Collins asserted that the network was credentialed by the United Nations, effectively justifying CNN’s attendance at the assembly. This exchange illustrates the increasing tension between the Trump administration and certain media outlets, particularly following the president’s recent decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House privileges.
Earlier that week, reports emerged that Trump’s administration had formally banned several media organisations from accessing the White House, prompting the affected outlets to file a First Amendment lawsuit seeking to restore their press access. In an ongoing effort to sideline unfavourable media, the legal challenge represents a significant clash regarding press freedoms.
In an extraordinary show of solidarity, several major networks including ABC, CBS, Fox News, and NBC announced a cessation of their White House TV Pool operations, indicating widespread concern about the implications of such a ban on journalistic integrity. Concurrently, Trump launched a new media venture, dubbed Trump TV, designed to deliver round-the-clock coverage of his administration, further hinting at the growing divide between Trump and traditional media outlets.
On the other hand, Collins has maintained her focus on her role as a journalist despite the personal attacks. Speaking on The Daily Show, she stated her intention to shift the narrative back to the work of journalism rather than allowing it to be about her reaction to Trump’s insults. “It’s really not about me. I don’t want it to be about my reaction,” she noted, emphasising the importance of holding leaders accountable for their responses to media inquiries.
In a notable contrast, the First Lady, Melania Trump, had approved credentials for CNN to cover her at the same U.N. event, showcasing a differing approach to media engagement within the Trump administration. This juxtaposition highlights the fragmented dynamics between various factions of the administration and their interactions with the press.
As these developments unfold, the implications for media freedom and governmental transparency loom larger. The ongoing strife between President Trump and specific media figures, particularly Collins, underscores a larger national conversation about the role and treatment of journalists in the current political landscape. The way this struggle plays out may have lasting effects on the relationship between the U.S. government and the media, defining the narrative for years to come.
