Ben Pasternak, an Australian entrepreneur, has denied assault and strangulation charges following the end of his relationship with social media influencer Evelyn Ha on March 31. The situation escalated on the night their relationship dissolved, leading to Pasternak’s arrest and subsequent charges. Court documents indicate that Pasternak faces one count of second-degree strangulation and one count of assault with intent to cause physical injury.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/evelyn-ha-ben-pasternak-042326-2aa-428a51e01766426ca7cc80ad6e844a33.jpg)

On April 21, Pasternak was taken into custody, with legal records confirming that he pleaded not guilty to both charges during his arraignment. In his defence, the 23-year-old claimed he acted in self-defence, a statement echoed by his attorney Joshua D. Kirshner, who has also known Pasternak for a decade.

Kirshner emphasised Pasternak’s steadfast denial of the allegations made by Ha. He stated, “Ben unilaterally denies the accusation Evelyn Ha has made against him,” highlighting the assertion that the events reported have been misrepresented. However, he refrained from providing further details, citing legal restrictions on what could be disclosed publicly.
In statements provided to the media, Pasternak’s representative, Dini Von Mueffling, reiterated that the charges do not accurately reflect the circumstances surrounding the incident. “Based on our independent investigation, the allegations mischaracterise what occurred,” she remarked, expressing confidence that subsequent evidence will reveal that the charges are unfounded.
Evelyn Ha has yet to publicly comment on the situation as attempts to obtain a statement from both her and the New York Police Department remain unanswered. The public is keen on understanding the details of the unfolding case, particularly due to the high-profile nature of Pasternak’s and Ha’s respective careers.
The timelines noted in the court documents suggest that tensions between the former couple exacerbated swiftly following their breakup, culminating in the alleged altercation. This aspect has raised questions about the dynamics of their relationship leading up to the incident.
As legal proceedings continue, Pasternak is scheduled to appear in court on June 11. His legal team is expected to present their defence and challenge the prosecution’s case as more facts are revealed. Until then, Pasternak’s narrative remains one of innocence amidst increasingly serious accusations.
With rising public interest in personal and societal matters surrounding allegations of this nature, the case will likely attract significant media coverage as it progresses through the judicial system. The outcome will not only impact those directly involved but could also resonate with broader societal discussions regarding relationship dynamics and allegations of violence.
It remains to be seen how this case will develop in court, but both Pasternak and Ha’s public personas are likely to be scrutinised as the situation unfolds. As the saga continues, observers are poised to see the implications these events may have on both parties’ futures, both professionally and personally.
