President Donald Trump has publicly dismissed the recent remarks made by Energy Secretary Chris Wright regarding gas prices in the context of the ongoing conflict in Iran. Wright’s prediction that fuel costs could remain above £3 per gallon until next year was quickly countered by Trump, who labelled the assertion as “totally wrong.”
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/donald-trump-gas-pump-042026-492c1cf3148f4fd9aea18ad415b7a718.jpg)
On 19 April, during an appearance on CNN, Wright expressed uncertainty about when consumers might see a reduction in gas prices, which currently stood at an average of £4.04 per gallon, as reported by AAA. He suggested that the prices had likely peaked and would eventually decline, particularly if the conflict were to reach a resolution. However, Trump’s retort came swiftly when he spoke to The Hill the following day, asserting his disagreement with Wright’s assessment.

In earlier comments made in March, Wright optimistically described the rising prices as a “short-term disruption,” indicating that he believed a return to more favourable rates would occur within a matter of weeks. Nevertheless, the conflict—initiated by military actions from the U.S. and Israel on 28 February—has severely impacted global oil markets. This escalation followed Iran’s decision to restrict crucial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a significant conduit for the world’s oil supply. In light of Iran’s actions, Trump had also announced a blockade of Iranian ports as a form of retaliation.

Despite Trump’s assertive messaging about the military situation, he has faced scrutiny over gas prices. On 12 April, during an interview on Fox News, he stated that prices “could be the same or maybe a little higher” by the time of the midterm elections in November. His inconsistency on this issue reflects growing concerns about the economic implications of the conflict.
The war has taken a heavy toll, with reports indicating that around 3,375 Iranians have lost their lives since hostilities began, not to mention the casualties in Lebanon stemming from the conflict. The Lebanese health ministry recently reported nearly 2,300 deaths related to the Israeli invasion. As international tensions continue to rise, diplomatic efforts have resumed, with a new round of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran scheduled to initiate in Pakistan.
In his typically assertive style, Trump remarked that if an agreement were reached under his leadership, it would ensure peace and security not just for the Middle East, but globally. He contrasted this potential success with what he termed “years of embarrassment and humiliation” under previous administrations.
As the political climate shifts, questions regarding the government’s plan to combat rising fuel prices remain paramount. Following Wright’s comments, Senator Andy Kim from New Jersey expressed frustration, stating, “They don’t have a plan to lower gas prices or get us out of this mess—and they never have.”
Recent polling data indicates that Trump’s handling of both the economy and the Iran war is viewed unfavourably by a significant portion of the American public. A Quinnipiac University poll revealed that 65% of voters hold Trump responsible for the surge in gas prices, with a staggering 73% of independents expressing similar sentiments. Moreover, his approval ratings for managing inflation and the overall cost of living continue to dwindle, with only 32% of Americans stating they approve of his approach.
As the nation grapples with the implications of high gas prices amid geopolitical turmoil, it remains to be seen how the administration will address these pressing concerns leading into the midterm elections. The interplay between military strategy and economic stability will be pivotal in shaping public sentiment and potential voter behaviour in the coming months.
