**Acquittal for Cole Goldberg in Attempted Murder Case Involving Ex-Partner Caroline Schwitzky**
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Cole-Goldberg-031226-bc961e45e1d14a5ca6daec6282de9fb3.jpg)

In a significant ruling, Cole Goldberg, a former partner of reality television star Caroline Schwitzky, has been acquitted of attempted murder charges by a judge in Palm Beach County, Florida. The verdict was delivered on Thursday, 12 March, concluding a trial marked by emotional testimonies and conflicting accounts of a dramatic incident that took place during the Boca Bash event in 2022.

Goldberg, 27, faced accusations of attempting to drown Schwitzky, who gained fame as a cast member of the reality show “90 Day Fiancé: Happily Ever After?” in 2016. Following three days of testimony, Circuit Judge John Parnofiello announced the not guilty verdict, which also included a dismissal of charges related to simple battery and battery by strangulation.
The claims arose from an altercation during the aforementioned event in 2022, where Schwitzky alleged that Goldberg intentionally held her head underwater, leading her to fear for her life. In her testimony, she described the frightening moment when she believed she was under attack, stating she felt as if she was “being dragged like a rag doll.” Schwitzky further expressed that, in her panic, she initially thought she could be facing a shark before realising it was Goldberg who was in the water with her.
Goldberg’s legal representation maintained that he did not act with any intent to harm. They contended that his actions were misguided attempts to rescue Schwitzky from what he perceived as a potentially dangerous situation. Goldberg himself took the stand, expressing that he entered the water due to concern for her safety, describing the surroundings as “unfamiliar.”
Throughout the trial, Assistant State Attorney Victoria Suarez provided compelling testimony from multiple witnesses aboard nearby boats. These individuals corroborated Schwitzky’s version of events, suggesting that several people observed the struggle occurring in the water. Suarez highlighted the rarity of such corroborating evidence in domestic violence cases, remarking, “It’s a rare day that a domestic violence case is going to have six independent eyewitnesses.”
The critical testimony and evidence presented in court ultimately led to the judge’s decision, which emphasised the importance of impartiality and fairness in the proceedings. Schwitzky’s dramatic recounting of her experience and the corroborating witnesses formed a crucial foundation for the prosecution’s case.
Following the acquittal, Goldberg expressed relief and gratitude, stating, “I’m so glad the truth finally came out… I can’t believe she would ever think I could do something like that.” He described the lengthy ordeal since the incident in 2022 as a burden that had felt immense until this verdict, stating that he holds no ill will toward Schwitzky.
Goldberg’s legal team also released a statement reflecting their satisfaction with the outcome. They praised Judge Parnofiello for his fair conduct during the trial and acknowledged the stress that both parties endured throughout this drawn-out situation. “We are all relieved and grateful that this four-year ordeal is over,” they noted.
Goldberg had initially been arrested by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in connection with the case when he was 23. At that time, he faced severe charges of attempted homicide, battery, and battery by strangulation, to which he pleaded not guilty. The complexity and seriousness of the allegations garnered considerable media attention, primarily due to the prominent status of Schwitzky from the reality television world.
In the wake of the trial, attempts to reach representatives for both Goldberg and Schwitzky have been made to clarify their perspectives on the verdict and the events that transpired. As both individuals move forward from this tumultuous chapter, the courtroom drama has raised questions regarding the dynamics of relationships and how incidents of this nature can have lasting impacts.
The case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding allegations of domestic violence and the legal ramifications that follow. With the verdict in place and the public spotlight on the outcomes of such incidents, it remains paramount for society to address the broader issues of safety and communication in intimate relationships.
