A Georgia woman has launched a lawsuit against the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), alleging that she suffered considerable pain due to improper screening procedures at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in May 2024. Kerri Thomas’s complaint, filed on 18 February, cites a specific incident in which TSA agents allegedly ignored her requests for a pat-down due to her spinal cord stimulator implant.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/tsa-line-up-2025-030426-77475da00ece47aabaa5983a2d97fa61.jpg)
Thomas claims that on 21 May 2024, she arrived at the airport security checkpoint early in the morning and promptly informed TSA personnel of her medical device. She presented a medical identification card indicating her condition, but her plea to bypass the metal detector was reportedly dismissed. In the complaint, Thomas states she was told that passing through the scanner was mandatory if she wished to board her flight.
The lawsuit goes on to detail how Thomas requested to be taken to a private area for a pat-down instead of being subjected to the metal detector. Eventually, she claims a TSA agent responded, “the only way you are getting on the plane is to go through the machine.” This forced choice is at the heart of Thomas’s charges against the agency.
According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, spinal cord stimulators are devices implanted to send low levels of electricity to the spinal cord, helping to alleviate chronic pain. While these devices are detectable by security scanners, passengers can utilise medical identification documents to avoid the machines. In her statement, Thomas alleges that even after reiterating her medical condition to a different TSA employee, she was advised that the screening machine had been “adjusted” to mitigate any adverse effects on her device.
As Thomas went through the scanner, she purportedly felt a “shock and immediate pain” as the machine interfered with her spinal cord stimulator. The legal complaint asserts that her device was damaged as a result of this interaction, leading to further medical treatment and surgical intervention.
The TSA’s official guidelines state that passengers can request a pat-down procedure if they do not wish to undergo screening via technology. They also provide for private screenings conducted by officers of the same sex upon request. However, Thomas’s allegations indicate that such policies were not adhered to during her encounter.
In her legal filing, Thomas claims to have sustained both physical injuries and emotional distress, seeking unspecified monetary damages. The lawsuit is brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which permits individuals to sue the government for damages in certain circumstances. Thomas is requesting a jury trial to resolve her claims.
Thomas’s attorney has yet to speak publicly on the matter, and inquiries have been made to both the TSA and Thomas’s legal representative for further insight into the case. As the legal proceedings unfold, this case highlights ongoing discussions about airport security processes, especially concerning passengers with medical implants.
The incident raises pertinent questions about traveller safety, medical device screening protocols, and the responsibilities of agencies like the TSA in accommodating individuals with special medical needs. As the situation develops, it will be closely monitored by both legal experts and advocacy groups that focus on passenger rights and safety within public transport facilities.