Daniel Day-Lewis Accuses Brian Cox of Creating a ‘Conflict’ About Method Acting: ‘He’s Been Given a Soapbox’

Daniel Day-Lewis Responds to Brian Cox’s Criticism of Method Acting

Renowned actor Daniel Day-Lewis recently addressed criticism from fellow actor Brian Cox regarding Method acting, sparking a discussion within the acting community. The two actors found themselves inadvertently entangled in a debate on the popular acting technique, with Day-Lewis expressing his views in a candid interview.

In a recent interview with the U.K.’s Big Issue, Day-Lewis, 68, revealed that he felt pulled into the discourse on Method acting due to comments made by Cox, 79. Cox had previously suggested in a 2023 interview with Variety that their mutual colleague, Jeremy Strong, had delved into Method acting under the influence of Day-Lewis. This remark seemed to draw Day-Lewis into an unexpected spotlight, prompting him to address the issue publicly.

Acknowledging Cox’s talent and body of work, Day-Lewis emphasised his respect for the veteran actor while expressing his reluctance to engage in what he described as a ‘handbags-at-dawn conflict’. He pointed out that Cox has a platform to voice his opinions, which he seems unwaveringly resolute in maintaining. Day-Lewis made it clear that he is open to discussing the matter with Cox whenever the latter deems fit.

Having collaborated on the movie “The Boxer” in 1997, Day-Lewis and Cox share a professional history. Cox had previously insinuated that Day-Lewis’ method acting approach had influenced Strong’s own acting style. Strong, known for his role in “Succession”, had worked as Day-Lewis’ assistant on a project and later played a part in a film alongside him.

Addressing Cox’s comments on their working relationship and its impact on Strong, Day-Lewis expressed his bewilderment at the allegations. Dismissing any notion of interference in Strong’s process, he distanced himself from the idea that he held responsibility for Strong’s acting choices. Day-Lewis clarified that his mentorship with Strong was based on mutual respect and admiration for each other’s craft.

In his interview, Day-Lewis also highlighted the misrepresentation of Method acting in public discourse, expressing frustration at the oversimplification and sensationalism surrounding the topic. He disapproved of the common association between Method acting and ‘lunacy’, emphasising his commitment to his craft and the serious approach he takes towards his roles. Day-Lewis underlined the importance of focusing on the substance of his work rather than trivial details.

As the discussion around Method acting continues to evolve within the acting community, Day-Lewis’s perspective sheds light on the nuances of the technique and the misunderstandings that often surround it. His willingness to engage in dialogue with his peers demonstrates a commitment to artistic integrity and a desire to clarify misconceptions in the public domain.

In conclusion, the exchange between Day-Lewis and Cox offers a glimpse into the complexities of acting methodologies and the interpersonal dynamics within the industry. As actors navigate their artistic journeys, discussions like these serve to enrich the understanding of the craft and the collaborative relationships that underpin the world of film and theatre.