The Kennedy Center has been an iconic institution dedicated to the memory of former President John F. Kennedy since its inception in 1964. However, recent discussions have surfaced regarding the potential renaming of the establishment to include President Donald Trump’s name alongside Kennedy’s. The White House announced on December 18 that the Kennedy Center would be renamed the Trump-Kennedy Center, citing President Trump’s purported financial and reputational contributions to the building. This decision has sparked a debate about the legality and implications of such a move.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/donald-trump-kennedy-center-121925-1b15e630a2254ccf9c4bdcb986e19d69.jpg)
Legal experts have pointed out that changing the name of the Kennedy Center may require approval from Congress, as the establishment was designated as a living memorial for JFK under Public Law 88-260. With a federal statute prohibiting additional memorials or plaques in public spaces within the Kennedy Center, the question arises whether renaming the building directly falls under this category. The initial purpose of the institution was to serve as a national cultural center but was rechristened as a memorial to President Kennedy following his assassination.
Concerns have been raised about the legality of the name change, with many arguing that only Congress has the authority to make such a decision. Georgetown law professor David Super highlighted the statutory naming of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts as a potential roadblock to the unilateral renaming efforts. While proposals like the “Make Entertainment Great Again Act” could pave the way for a legitimate name change, without Congressional approval, any renaming would remain unofficial.
Members of the Kennedy family, including Maria Shriver and Kerry Kennedy, have vehemently opposed the renaming of the Kennedy Center. They have emphasised the legacy and values associated with President Kennedy and his contributions to the arts, expressing their dismay at the idea of adding President Trump’s name alongside his. The familial connection to the memorial and its significance as a tribute to JFK’s values has led to strong objections to the proposed renaming.
The power to change the Kennedy Center’s name has been a point of contention, with some questioning the authority of the Kennedy Center board to decide on such a significant alteration without Congressional involvement. Representative Joyce Beatty and other ex officio members have underscored the need for legislative oversight in matters concerning the naming of public institutions like the Kennedy Center. The legal and procedural complexities surrounding the renaming process continue to be a subject of debate and scrutiny.
In response to the name change, President Trump expressed surprise and gratitude for the decision, noting the prestigious nature of the Kennedy Center board. Despite his apparent endorsement of the renaming, critics have highlighted the lack of legal basis for the alteration and the importance of adhering to established protocols in such matters. Trump’s involvement in renaming other government buildings, like the U.S. Institute of Peace, has also drawn attention to his efforts to leave a lasting mark on public establishments during his tenure.
As the debate surrounding the renaming of the Kennedy Center unfolds, the tension between preserving historical legacies and acknowledging contemporary political figures remains at the forefront. The intersection of law, tradition, and political influence in the decision-making process underscores the complexities inherent in renaming a cherished memorial like the Kennedy Center. The enduring significance of the institution and its connection to President Kennedy’s legacy necessitates a thoughtful and considered approach to any proposed changes.