Baby Naming Experts Reveal 10 Names They Wouldn’t Name Their Own Kids

Baby Naming Experts Share 10 Names They Wouldn’t Choose for Their Own Children

Colleen Slagen and Jessie Paquette, who are professional baby naming consultants, recently discussed their least favourite baby names on their podcast Name 911. During this episode, the two experts revealed the top 10 names they do not approve of and provided insights into why these names don’t make the cut for them.

In the realm of baby names, honesty is key for Slagen and Paquette. Their podcast episode titled “Names We Hate” delves into their candid opinions on certain names that they believe are best avoided. The duo outlined several categories of names that they are not particularly fond of, with Slagen expressing her disapproval for last names used as first names. She pointed out that such choices can sometimes come across as either “country bumpkin” or “preppy lacrosse player,” highlighting the importance of considering how a name fits a person’s identity.

Paquette, on the other hand, emphasised the subjectivity of baby naming, stating that individual preferences should ultimately drive the decision-making process. She likened disagreements over baby names to differences in interior decorating tastes, where personal style plays a significant role in the final selection. Recognising the personal nature of naming a child, Paquette underscored the fact that not everyone will resonate with or appreciate the chosen name, and that’s perfectly acceptable.

While Slagen and Paquette may not see eye to eye on every name, they did converge on a list of ten names that they jointly disapprove of. For boys, the names August, Beau, Porter, Keegan, Griffin, and Maverick made the cut, while for girls, Olivia, Sophia, Eliana, and Lydia were mentioned. Paquette expressed her aversion to common girl names like Olivia and Sophia due to their prevalence, while she found Eliana’s attempt at uniqueness to be excessive. Slagen shared her reasons for disliking certain names, such as associating Lydia with a character she didn’t admire, and anticipating potential teasing for a name like Porter. Similarly, she didn’t favour Keegan or Griffin as choices.

Throughout their discussion, Slagen and Paquette highlighted the subjective nature of naming preferences and the diversity of tastes when it comes to selecting baby names. Although they found common ground on certain names to avoid, they acknowledged that naming choices are deeply personal and can evoke strong reactions in individuals. The duo’s contrasting views on specific names underscored the range of considerations that parents navigate when choosing a name for their child.

The episode resonated with listeners who appreciated the experts’ candid and relatable insights into the complexities of baby naming. By shedding light on their own naming preferences and dislikes, Slagen and Paquette encouraged parents to trust their instincts and choose a name that resonates with them personally, regardless of external opinions. The podcast episode served as a reminder that the journey of naming a child is unique to each family and that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to selecting the perfect name.

In conclusion, the discussion between Colleen Slagen and Jessie Paquette offered a fresh perspective on baby naming, highlighting the nuances and subjectivity involved in the decision-making process. While opinions on specific names may vary, the underlying message of embracing individuality and personal choice shone through. As prospective parents navigate the maze of baby names, the advice from these naming experts serves as a guiding light, encouraging families to prioritise authenticity and meaning when selecting a name for their little ones.