Matt Gaetz has recently denied allegations of purchasing sex with an underage homeless girl who was reportedly saving up for braces. The former congressman, who previously had the potential to be appointed as Donald Trump’s attorney general, refutes claims tied to a 2017 encounter with the teenager, which includes previous accusations of statutory rape.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/matt-gaetz-111425-2ec1a40749c0441b8055782f7ba7f6cb.jpg)

The unfolding saga has been revealed through newly released court documents referenced by The New York Times, shedding more light on the teenage girl who claimed to have engaged in sexual activity with Matt Gaetz in 2017. This individual, who played a pivotal role in investigations conducted by both the House Ethics Committee and the Department of Justice concerning Gaetz, was described as a “then-homeless, 17-year-old” at the time of the alleged incidents.

According to reports, the unnamed girl mentioned in the court documents was a high school junior in Florida, occasionally residing with a parent in a homeless shelter. She was known to work at McDonald’s, where she falsely claimed to be 18 in order to create a profile on a “sugar dating” website, aiming to earn money for dental braces. These revelations have added a deeper layer to the allegations surrounding Gaetz and his interactions with the teenager.
The allegations against Gaetz gained traction following a bipartisan House Ethics Committee investigation in December 2024. The committee’s report indicated “substantial evidence” pointing towards Gaetz engaging in sexual activity with a 17-year-old girl at a party in July 2017. The same party was attended by the teenager and his then-girlfriend, alongside other individuals.
The released court documents hinted at a sequence of events involving financial transactions and encounters between the teenage girl, Gaetz, and others. The girl alleged that after being paid for sex by Joel Greenberg, a former Gaetz associate, she engaged in further intimate activities with various individuals, including Gaetz. These claims have been vehemently denied by both Gaetz and other implicated parties.
In response to the mounting accusations, Gaetz has adamantly refuted the claims, stating that he had not engaged in sexual intercourse with the individual in question. He further asserted that the girl had threatened legal action unless a significant sum of money was paid to her. Gaetz’s rebuttals continue to fuel the controversy surrounding the alleged events of 2017.
The legal repercussions of these allegations have taken various turns, with the Department of Justice opting not to pursue charges against Gaetz in February 2023. Despite this, the House Ethics Committee found substantial evidence suggesting that Gaetz may have violated Florida’s statutory rape laws. The intricate details emerging from the investigations underline the complexity of the case and its implications on Gaetz’s political and legal standing.
As the saga unfolds, the intricate web of events and interactions between the involved parties continues to be scrutinised. The controversy surrounding the allegations against Gaetz raises significant questions regarding accountability, ethics, and the intersection of personal conduct with public service. The evolving narrative underscores the importance of thorough investigations and due process in addressing serious allegations of misconduct within political spheres.
In the aftermath of these developments, the ongoing scrutiny and legal proceedings surrounding the allegations against Gaetz serve as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in navigating issues of morality and legality within the realm of public office. The implications of these allegations extend beyond individual reputations, touching upon broader themes of accountability and integrity within the political landscape.
