Jack Schlossberg Criticizes Julia Fox’s Controversial Jackie Kennedy Halloween Costume
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/jack-schlossberg-julia-fox-103125-1fc819ee4a814614bad2a19c8945a89d.jpg)
Jack Schlossberg, grandson of President John F. Kennedy, has recently expressed his disappointment with actress Julia Fox’s choice of Halloween costume. The 32-year-old publicly criticised Fox, 35, after she attended a Halloween party wearing a blood-splattered replica of former first lady Jackie Kennedy’s iconic pink Chanel suit from the day of President Kennedy’s assassination on November 22, 1963.
In a post on October 31, Schlossberg condemned Fox’s costume, stating that her portrayal of political violence was “disgusting, desperate, and dangerous.” He also alluded to the fact that his late grandmother, Jackie Kennedy, would likely share his disapproval of Fox’s costume choice.
Fox had defended her controversial costume in a detailed Instagram post, explaining that she saw it as a statement rather than a mere costume. She highlighted Jackie Kennedy’s refusal to change out of her blood-stained clothes following her husband’s assassination, stating, “It was an act of extraordinary bravery… performance, protest, and mourning all at once.”
The juxtaposition of beauty and horror in the image of the blood-splattered pink suit, according to Fox, symbolised Jackie Kennedy’s resilience and her use of femininity as a form of resistance. Fox’s costume was intended to honour Jackie’s strength in the face of tragedy and to pay homage to her symbolism of grace in challenging circumstances.
Historically, Jackie Kennedy’s decision to remain in the pink suit after the assassination, despite being offered an alternative outfit, has been recognised as a powerful gesture of strength and continuity for the nation. The suit, stained with the president’s blood, was eventually sent to the National Archives where it remains to this day as a poignant historical artefact.
This incident is not the first time Schlossberg has spoken out in defence of his family’s legacy. Previously, he criticised President Donald Trump’s alterations to the historic Rose Garden and Jacqueline Kennedy Garden, accusing Trump of prioritising concrete over natural beauty and historical significance. Schlossberg emphasised the importance of preserving his grandmother’s legacy and the values she represented.
In light of the controversy surrounding Julia Fox’s Halloween costume, discussions have emerged about the boundaries of artistic expression and the interpretation of historical events. While some view Fox’s costume as a tribute to Jackie Kennedy’s resilience, others, including Schlossberg, perceive it as an inappropriate glorification of violence and tragedy for the sake of shock value.
As the debate continues, it raises questions about the ethics of re-enacting sensitive historical moments and the responsibility of individuals to consider the impact of their actions on the memory of significant figures in history. The clash of perspectives surrounding Fox’s costume showcases the complexities of navigating art, history, and public perception in contemporary culture.
Schlossberg’s vocal criticism of Julia Fox’s costume underscores the enduring legacy of the Kennedy family and their commitment to upholding the values of dignity, grace, and historical reverence. Despite differing opinions on the appropriateness of Fox’s artistic interpretation, the discussion sparked by this incident serves as a reminder of the profound impact that historical figures like Jackie Kennedy continue to have on society.