Karoline Leavitt Blasts Reporter by Posting Screenshot of His Private Texts. Now Her Bizarre Reply Is Going Viral

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has stirred up a storm on social media by revealing a private text conversation with a reporter. The 28-year-old official shared a screenshot of her exchange with HuffPost White House correspondent S.V. Dáte, where she sarcastically responded to his inquiry about a meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The controversy began when Dáte asked Leavitt if Trump understood the importance of Budapest, where the two leaders were planning to meet. In a dismissive tone, Leavitt quipped, “Your mom did,” sparking a heated back-and-forth.

The White House correspondent then questioned the seriousness of their discussion, to which Leavitt fired back by questioning his credentials as a journalist. Accusing Dáte of left-wing bias, Leavitt labelled him as a “far left hack” who peddles Democrat talking points. She further criticised the reporter for what she deemed as disingenuous and biased inquiries. In her social media post, Leavitt sought to discredit Dáte by portraying him as an anti-Trump activist masquerading as a journalist. The White House press secretary’s scathing remarks about the reporter’s credibility and professionalism have ignited a debate online.

Leavitt’s nonchalant reference to Dáte’s mother in the text exchange has particularly caught the attention of internet users, with many expressing shock and disapproval. Critics have condemned the press secretary’s response as immature and unbecoming of her position in the administration. The incident has raised concerns about the conduct of public officials and their interactions with the media. Leavitt’s decision to publicly shame a reporter has been met with widespread criticism, reflecting the growing tensions between the press and government officials.

As the screenshot of the conversation circulated on various social media platforms, discussions about journalistic integrity and political discourse have been reignited. The incident has highlighted the challenges faced by journalists covering the White House and the hostile environment in which they operate. Leavitt’s actions have sparked a broader conversation about the state of media relations under the current administration. The controversy serves as a reminder of the importance of a respectful and professional dialogue between the government and the press in a democratic society.

While Leavitt’s defence of her response may resonate with some supporters, it has also underscored the polarisation and divisiveness in political discourse. The clash between the White House press secretary and the reporter exemplifies the broader struggles within contemporary journalism and public communication. As the debate continues to unfold online, it underscores the need for civil discourse and mutual respect in the realm of public affairs. The incident serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges of navigating the complexities of media relations in an era of heightened political tensions.