DOJ Quietly Deletes Study After Charlie Kirk’s Death That Says Right-Wing Extremists Engage in ‘Far More’ Political Violence

**DOJ Removes Study on Right-Wing Violence Following Charlie Kirk’s Death**

The US Department of Justice recently removed a study on right-wing violence from its website after the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent right-wing political commentator. The study, titled “What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism,” was taken down from the DOJ website under President Donald Trump’s administration. However, it can still be accessed through an archived post on the Wayback Machine.

The study highlighted a concerning trend, stating that “Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States.” It further revealed that “far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.”

Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University as part of his American Comeback Tour. The 31-year-old was targeted by a 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson, who allegedly confessed to carrying out the crime due to his dissatisfaction with Kirk’s views. Robinson even described his own father as a “diehard maga” member.

In response to Kirk’s death, President Trump appeared on Fox & Friends and made controversial remarks, expressing his disinterest in bridging political divides. He placed blame on the left, calling them “vicious” and “horrible.” This incident adds to a series of political violence cases, including the assassination of Minnesota House Democratic leader Melissa Hortman and her husband.

The removal of the DOJ study has sparked discussions on the prevalence of right-wing extremism and the need for addressing such threats. The incident also sheds light on the escalating political tensions in the country, where violence seems to be increasingly used as a means to silence opposing voices. The tragic death of Charlie Kirk serves as a grim reminder of the real-world consequences of political extremism.

As investigations continue into the motives behind Kirk’s assassination, authorities are urged to tackle the root causes of such violent acts and work towards fostering a more inclusive and respectful political discourse. The repercussions of this event are far-reaching, prompting a critical examination of how ideological differences are navigated and resolved within society. It remains to be seen how this incident will influence the ongoing discourse on political violence and extremism in the United States.