Justin Baldoni’s legal team has staunchly refuted claims made by actress Blake Lively that they were responsible for leaking details from her deposition to the media. In a recent court filing in response to Lively’s motion to strike, Baldoni’s lawyers directly addressed the accusation, stating that the actress alleges, ‘it appears that the Wayfarer Defendants immediately leaked details from the deposition to the tabloid media,’ yet fails to provide any evidence to substantiate her claim.
Lively, who was questioned by Baldoni’s lawyers during her deposition on July 31, pointed fingers at them for the alleged leak. However, Baldoni’s legal representatives argued that there was no concrete evidence linking them to the unauthorized disclosure of information. They further suggested that leaks could have originated from Lively’s own side, citing multiple potential sources such as Lively herself, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and their legal team.
Moreover, the legal team representing Baldoni questioned Lively’s assumption regarding the responsibility for the leak. They highlighted various other individuals who were present at the deposition and could have potentially disclosed the information. The lawyers emphasized that the identities of those attending the deposition were not sensitive or newsworthy, as all parties involved have the right to be present during such legal proceedings.
In response to these developments, a spokesperson for Lively conveyed their satisfaction with the outcome of her deposition. The representative expressed eagerness to depose Justin Baldoni and the other co-defendants promptly. Emphasizing the confidential nature of deposition testimony, the spokesperson underscored that such information is crucial evidence in legal proceedings and is subject to stringent rules and regulations.
The ongoing legal dispute between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni stems from their involvement in the film “It Ends With Us,” where Lively starred alongside Baldoni, who also served as the director. Lively’s recent motion raised concerns about tabloid coverage that she claimed was orchestrated by Baldoni’s team to create a media spectacle surrounding her deposition.
Not only did Lively’s legal team accuse Baldoni’s side of attempting to fuel a media frenzy around the deposition, but they also sought to strike a 292-page draft of her deposition transcript from the sealed court record. They argued that including the full document, when only two pages were cited, had no legal basis and was a tactic to sensationalize the proceedings.
As the legal battle continues, with a trial scheduled for March 2026, both Lively and Baldoni are anticipated to provide testimony. The courtroom showdown between the two stars is poised to be a crucial moment in the ongoing legal saga surrounding the film project that brought them together.
In conclusion, the legal back-and-forth between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni and their respective legal teams highlights the complexities of the entertainment industry and the intricacies of legal proceedings in Hollywood. As the case progresses, the public will be eager to see how these developments unfold and what impact they may have on the industry as a whole.