Wendy Williams’ former husband, Kevin Hunter, has filed a lawsuit against her guardian and the judge overseeing her case, seeking a staggering $250 million in damages. The legal action names 48 defendants allegedly involved in her ongoing guardianship, which began in 2022 following her dementia diagnosis. The lawsuit, which Hunter claims is on Williams’ behalf, does not aim to terminate the guardianship but rather requests a new guardian for her.
This latest legal development comes after years of contention surrounding Wendy Williams’ guardianship. Hunter alleges that Williams has suffered from abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation under the guardianship system. The lawsuit accuses various parties, including her legal guardian Sabrina Morrissey, Judge Lisa Sokoloff, Wells Fargo, her assisted living facility, and several lawyers, of violating her constitutional rights.
LaShawn Thomas, the attorney representing Williams in this lawsuit, clarified that Williams may not be aware of all the evidence supporting her case against the guardianship. The legal team is committed to presenting compelling evidence to ensure Williams’ rights are upheld and that she is financially compensated for the harm she has endured.
The lawsuit does not seek to end Williams’ guardianship but calls for significant reforms, including the appointment of an impartial guardian, unsealing of case files, release from involuntary confinement, a full financial audit, and the aforementioned $250 million in damages. Hunter is named as a co-plaintiff and seeks to act as Williams’ next friend to protect her interests.
According to Hunter, the guardianship process failed to adhere to proper legal standards, leading to Williams’ alleged mistreatment and financial mismanagement. Hunter accuses the defendants of using Williams’ assets for their benefit, including funding the legal battle against her. The lawsuit further alleges instances of exploitation, such as unauthorized dissemination of personal information and limitations on Williams’ legal representation.
Williams’ legal team also claims that her financial advisor, Lori Schiller of Wells Fargo, directed funds from Williams’ account to a medical professional who provided a questionable medical opinion supporting the guardianship. Additionally, there are allegations of conflicts of interest, with claims that some defendants financially supported the judge overseeing Williams’ case.
The lawsuit paints a grim picture of Williams’ situation, describing her as a victim of systemic abuse and deprivation of rights. It underscores the need for transparency and accountability in guardianship cases to prevent exploitation and ensure the well-being of individuals under such arrangements.
As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen how the courts will address the complex issues raised in the lawsuit. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the guardianship system and the protection of vulnerable individuals like Wendy Williams. People continue to follow this story closely as it evolves, awaiting further insights into the circumstances surrounding Williams’ guardianship and the potential impact of this significant legal action.