He Killed and Ate His Girlfriend Nearly 40 Years Ago. Here’s Why His Parole Is Now Being Reversed

California Parole Board Reverses Decision to Grant Parole for Man Who Killed and Ate His Girlfriend Almost 40 Years Ago

The California Board of Parole Hearings has backtracked on their offer to grant parole to a man convicted of a heinous crime nearly four decades ago. Leslie Closner, who was sentenced to 25 years to life for the brutal murder of his girlfriend, has had his parole reversed. The decision comes after disturbing details of the case resurfaced, shedding light on the gruesome nature of the crime.

Leslie Closner’s case dates back to 1988 when he pleaded guilty to first-degree murder. The horrific incident took place on October 16, 1987, when Closner and his girlfriend, Jan Ferguson, were at a motel for her daughter’s wedding. A violent altercation ensued between the couple, resulting in Closner fatally strangling Ferguson after shoving her to the ground. Following her death, Closner desecrated her body in ways that shocked investigators.

Reports from a parole review document reveal that after killing Ferguson, Closner moved her body to a bed, sexually assaulted her corpse, and even resorted to cannibalism by consuming parts of her body. Despite attempting resuscitation, Closner eventually fled the scene but returned to engage in further disturbing acts before being later apprehended by Oregon police.

Former California Governor Jerry Brown, in a 2018 decision to deny Closner’s parole, highlighted a pattern of aggressive behaviour exhibited by the convict. The parole review detailed instances of emotional and physical abuse towards Ferguson during their five-year relationship, indicating a deeply troubled individual with a history of violence.

Closner himself acknowledged his unhealthy obsession with Ferguson, attributing it to unresolved childhood trauma and issues with his mother. The parole review document outlined Closner’s troubling past, including a turbulent marriage marked by domestic abuse and attempts to strangle his ex-wife. Brown’s assessment deemed Closner a significant risk to society if released, citing his erratic behaviour and violent tendencies.

The decision to reverse Closner’s parole offer has been met with relief by many, particularly the victim’s family. The Sutter County District Attorney’s Office expressed gratitude towards the family for their unwavering support throughout the years. They affirmed their commitment to seeking justice for the victim and ensuring the safety of the community in light of such a heinous crime.

Cases like Leslie Closner’s serve as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges within the criminal justice system, particularly when dealing with individuals who exhibit extreme and violent behaviour. The decision to deny parole in this instance underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and consideration of all factors before allowing convicted individuals back into society.

Domestic violence helplines, such as the National Domestic Violence Hotline, play a crucial role in supporting those in need and preventing tragic outcomes like the one in Closner’s case. It is essential to raise awareness and provide resources to address and combat such forms of violence proactively.

In conclusion, the reversal of Leslie Closner’s parole decision represents a step towards accountability and justice for the victim and her family. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the need for vigilance and careful consideration in addressing cases of extreme violence and ensuring the safety of communities.