Menendez Brothers’ Relatives Claim D.A. Has ‘Personal Bias’: ‘Treated Us Like We Don’t Matter’

Menendez Brothers’ Relatives Accuse District Attorney of Personal Bias

Family members of the Menendez brothers have spoken out against what they claim is a “personal bias” held by Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman regarding the brothers’ plea for release. In a press conference held outside Hochman’s office on Thursday, March 20, Lyle and Erik’s cousin Tamara Goodell expressed their frustration, stating, “At every turn, we feel like D.A. Hochman has dismissed us, ignored us, and quite frankly, treated us like we don’t matter. Why? Why does he seem to be making this case so personal?”

The Menendez brothers are currently serving life sentences for the brutal 1989 murder of their parents, Kitty and Jose Menendez. Lyle and Erik claimed they took their parents’ lives out of fear for their own safety, alleging that their father had subjected them to years of sexual abuse. However, Hochman recently announced that he would not support their resentencing, arguing that the brothers have not fully taken responsibility for their actions and have been dishonest about the events leading up to the murders.

Hochman’s refusal to recommend resentencing dealt a severe blow to the hopes of the Menendez brothers for potential release. He challenged the brothers to admit to 16 alleged lies they have told over the past three decades before his office would consider supporting their resentencing. Goodell criticised Hochman for his approach, suggesting that he is failing to consider the abuse and trauma the brothers endured, and unfairly portraying them as ongoing risks to society.

The Menendez case has taken numerous twists and turns over the years, with the latest setback occurring in February when Hochman opposed a habeas corpus petition filed by the brothers in 2023. The petition included allegations of sexual abuse by Jose Menendez from a Menudo boy band member and a letter written by Erik detailing his father’s abuse prior to the murders. A resentencing hearing is scheduled for April 11, with a parole board appearance set for June 13.

In response to Hochman’s stance, Goodell emphasised the positive impact the brothers have had during their time in prison, suggesting that they have shown remorse and contributed positively to the community behind bars. Despite Hochman’s assertions, Goodell maintained that Erik and Lyle are not the dangers to society that they are portrayed to be, and that their past actions as traumatised individuals should be taken into account.

The ongoing legal battle surrounding the Menendez brothers’ case has drawn attention to the complexities of the criminal justice system and the importance of considering individual circumstances in cases of serious crimes. The controversy highlights the need for thorough evaluation and sensitivity when addressing cases involving allegations of abuse and trauma, as well as the significance of fair and impartial proceedings in the pursuit of justice.

As the Menendez brothers await their upcoming legal proceedings, the debate over their potential release continues to spark discussion and raise questions about the nature of justice, rehabilitation, and redemption in the context of heinous crimes. The public remains divided on the issue, with supporters of the brothers advocating for a second chance, while critics argue that the severity of their actions necessitates continued incarceration. The ultimate outcome of the legal battle remains uncertain, leaving both sides waiting for a resolution in a case that has captured national attention and sparked crucial conversations about justice and accountability.